2014
DOI: 10.1177/1545968314533613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Combined Somatosensory Stimulation and Task-Specific Training on Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke

Abstract: Long-lasting improvements in upper limb function were observed following TST. Additional benefit of SS was seen immediately post treatment, but did not persist and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature reports only 1 study that, similar to the present study, applied simultaneous stimulation of median, radial, and ulnar nerves 33 . (However, in delivering PNS at the elbow, this protocol differed from the present study, which delivered multiple nerve stimulation more distally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature reports only 1 study that, similar to the present study, applied simultaneous stimulation of median, radial, and ulnar nerves 33 . (However, in delivering PNS at the elbow, this protocol differed from the present study, which delivered multiple nerve stimulation more distally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Additionally, the present study delivered individual PNS trains with an offset of 35ms between each stimulation channel to prevent stimulation of distal nerves from being blocked by stimulation of more proximal nerves, a phenomenon known as “collision” in nerve conduction studies 34, 35 .) Fleming and colleagues administered 2 hours of PNS immediately prior to 30 minutes of task-specific training for 33 subjects with chronic stroke 33 . At post-intervention, more significant improvement on the ARAT was evident for the active PNS group compared with the sham PNS group; but no significant between-groups difference was evident on secondary measures (ie, FMA; Motor Activity Log; Goal Attainment Scale) or at long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task-specific training was recently reported to induce long-term improvements (up to 6 months from the intervention) in upper limb motor function after stroke 83 . We speculate that the BCI-based rewarding 28,84 of MI promotes longlasting retention of motor performance with respect to MI practice in an open loop condition.…”
Section: Functional Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In addition, randomized controlled trials showing that PNS can enhance outcomes of task-oriented training have primarily targeted only mild-to-moderate UE impairment. [16][17][18][19] In sum, although pairing PNS with motor training can enhance motor recovery after stroke, it remains unclear how severity of motor deficit may affect responsiveness to this paired intervention.…”
Section: July 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In addition, randomized controlled trials showing that PNS can enhance outcomes of task-oriented training have primarily targeted only mild-to-moderate UE impairment. [16][17][18][19] In sum, although pairing PNS with motor training can enhance motor recovery after stroke, it remains unclear how severity of motor deficit may affect responsiveness to this paired intervention.14 To address these evidence gaps, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether active PNS paired with intensive task-oriented training would lead to significantly more improved movement function than sham PNS paired with intensive task-oriented training for subjects with chronic, severe deficit in UE movement function after stroke. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%