1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02666665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of composition on marker movement and kirkendall porosity in ternary alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is found that, after annealing, Cu and Ni elements are uniformly distributed among each other as shown by the EDX mapping of the struts of the foams in Figure 2 The formation of micropores at the interface of Cu−Ni is a hallmark of the so-called Kirkendall effect, which is attributed to the significantly higher diffusion rates of Cu atoms compared to that of Ni at an elevated temperature. 33,34 Our further quantitative analysis supports this mechanism well. The diffusion coefficients (D) of Ni and Cu atoms can be determined with the Arrhenius expression given by D = C•e −E/RT , where the diffusion constants (C) are 0.78, 2.7, 0.57, and 1.77 cm 2 /s for Cu-in-Cu, Ni-in-Cu, Cu-in-Ni, and Ni-in-Ni, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is found that, after annealing, Cu and Ni elements are uniformly distributed among each other as shown by the EDX mapping of the struts of the foams in Figure 2 The formation of micropores at the interface of Cu−Ni is a hallmark of the so-called Kirkendall effect, which is attributed to the significantly higher diffusion rates of Cu atoms compared to that of Ni at an elevated temperature. 33,34 Our further quantitative analysis supports this mechanism well. The diffusion coefficients (D) of Ni and Cu atoms can be determined with the Arrhenius expression given by D = C•e −E/RT , where the diffusion constants (C) are 0.78, 2.7, 0.57, and 1.77 cm 2 /s for Cu-in-Cu, Ni-in-Cu, Cu-in-Ni, and Ni-in-Ni, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Mesoscopically, the distinct diffusion rates of Cu and Ni result in a net mass flow from the Cu-enriched region to the Ni-enriched region in the struts of Ni–Cu alloy foams, which is equivalent to a net flow of vacancies in the opposite direction. With sufficient time, the vacancies in the Cu-enriched area accumulate and eventually coalesce into larger micropores that reduce the total surface energy driven by thermodynamics. , In previous research, substantial efforts have been devoted to reducing porosity resulting from such a Kirkendall effect because it significantly impairs the mechanical integrity of materials as well as their thermal and electrical conductivities. However, in this work, we made the first attempt to strategically leverage the Kirkendall effect to create a new level of porosity in the entire 3D Ni foams.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i¼1 X i j i ðt; ÀKÞ: ½13 The second equality in Eq. [13] can be treated also as an assumption on the boundary evolutions j i . On the other hand, Eqs.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirkendall's discovery, further quantified by Darken, plays an important role in formulating the basis of the theory of interdiffusion in multicomponent material, i.e., the vacancy-dependent diffusion mechanism and convection. [11][12][13] In the Darken method, an isothermal isobaric process of diffusional mixing of the components in a closed system is described. It is assumed that the diffusion takes place in one direction, diffusion in one dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the appearance of extrema in the penetration curves-a phenomena that was first recognized in careful multicomponent diffusion experiments-is well accounted for using the square-root diffusivity method. Quantitative predictions of multicomponent effects using the square-root diffusivity method, particularly the forms of the penetration curves, have been checked against experiments, with generally good results [18,19,20,21]. Moreover, several schemes for classifying the forms of multicomponent penetration curves and their associated diffusion paths for a given diffusion couple have been discussed by Gupta and Cooper [22], Thompson and Morral [1], [2], and by Stalker and Morral [23].…”
Section: Defect and Diffusion Forum Vols 237-240 231mentioning
confidence: 99%