1979
DOI: 10.1148/130.1.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Computed Tomography Viewer Controls on Anatomical Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CT scans (Siemens DR2) were taken for evaluation of airway patency for diagnostic purposes. A fixed window level of 30 Hounsfield units was determined to emphasize soft tissue (Phelps et al, 1975;Koehler et al, 1979), and a window width of 210 Hounsfield units was used. These parameters were fixed for all subjects so that distortion of soft tissues and muscle outlines would be minimized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT scans (Siemens DR2) were taken for evaluation of airway patency for diagnostic purposes. A fixed window level of 30 Hounsfield units was determined to emphasize soft tissue (Phelps et al, 1975;Koehler et al, 1979), and a window width of 210 Hounsfield units was used. These parameters were fixed for all subjects so that distortion of soft tissues and muscle outlines would be minimized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of manual segmentation is limited by the dexterity, lassitude and fatigue of the observer. The manual adjustment of image contrast and the screen contrast can also influence the volume measured during manual segmentation [24], whereas automatic segmentation is independent of this setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively determining the location of tissue interfaces may not only yield inaccurate results because the most esthetic image does not necessarily correspond to the best window setting for measurements (Koehler et al, 1979;Seibert et al, 19811, but also introduces precision (observer) errors. In contrast, the repeatability of HMH measurements from a particular scan on a fixed location is virtually loo%, as the position of the measurement points is entirely defined by the HMH CT numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%