2013
DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0279.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of confining pressure on elastic wave velocities and dynamic to static Young’s modulus ratio

Abstract: We carried out laboratory experiments under dry conditions on limestone core specimens of Sarvak formation obtained from an oil well in the southwest of Iran. Our objective was to study the effect of confining pressure on the compressional and shear wave velocities ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and on the dynamic to static Young’s modulus ratio ([Formula: see text]). Furthermore, we made attempts to predict [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] at atmospheric pressure based on the same velo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that, when increasing confining pressure, both velocities increase from 2.92 to 3.69 km s −1 and 1.51 to 2.09 km s −1 , respectively. Below 10 MPa, the loading effect follows an exponential curve consistent with the previously described crack closure stress stage, i.e., an effect that has been reported or inferred from experimental data in a number of works (Asef and Najibi 2013;King 1983;Mikhaltsevitch et al 2014;Xu et al 2006). The unloading path is slightly different from the loading one, with higher average velocities.…”
Section: P-and S-wave Velocitiessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We observe that, when increasing confining pressure, both velocities increase from 2.92 to 3.69 km s −1 and 1.51 to 2.09 km s −1 , respectively. Below 10 MPa, the loading effect follows an exponential curve consistent with the previously described crack closure stress stage, i.e., an effect that has been reported or inferred from experimental data in a number of works (Asef and Najibi 2013;King 1983;Mikhaltsevitch et al 2014;Xu et al 2006). The unloading path is slightly different from the loading one, with higher average velocities.…”
Section: P-and S-wave Velocitiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…a and b). Furthermore, comparing dynamic to static moduli, we observe that E dyn is higher than E st , whereas ν dyn is lower than ν st , which has been significantly identified in the past (Asef and Najibi ; Eissa and Kazi ; King ; Fjær ). The reasons for such differences include the properties of the pore fluid, frequency of cracks, the stress path, and the inherent difference of strain amplitudes between static and dynamic (at ultrasonic frequencies) methods (Blake and Faulkner ; Fjær, Stroisz and Holt ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deformation may lower the acoustic wave velocities of our four samples due to the presence of cracks/fractures in the matrix as observed in the thin sections, even though the cracks are expected to close during the early stages of loading (Asef and Najibi, 2013). For example, Brereton (1992) reported very little variation of the elastic wave velocities of oceanic basaltic rocks above 25 MPa confining pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%