2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-682x(03)00116-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of construction material, contents and room geometry on the sound field in dwellings at low frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this model, the obtained natural frequencies from the plate theory assumption are [7] ω n = π 2 B ρ s 1/2 n y πy l y 2 + n z πz l z 2 (8) where l y and l z are the panel dimensions, B the bending stiffness, and ρ s the mass per unit area. To consider the fluid-structure interaction, the fluid pressure acting on the interface is added to the structural dynamic equation, and then the discretized dynamic equation of the structure is [17] […”
Section: Structural-acoustic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this model, the obtained natural frequencies from the plate theory assumption are [7] ω n = π 2 B ρ s 1/2 n y πy l y 2 + n z πz l z 2 (8) where l y and l z are the panel dimensions, B the bending stiffness, and ρ s the mass per unit area. To consider the fluid-structure interaction, the fluid pressure acting on the interface is added to the structural dynamic equation, and then the discretized dynamic equation of the structure is [17] […”
Section: Structural-acoustic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the sound insulation at low frequencies depends on the party wall properties and the geometry and dimensions of the contiguous rooms. Maluski and Gibbs [6][7][8] modelled sound transmission between adjacent rooms using the finite-element method (FEM). They investigated the dependency of sound-insulation characteristics of a party wall at low frequencies strongly with the modal characteristics of the sound field of both rooms and of the partition with different boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluctuations are about a mean shift of 0dB below 50 Hz and 2 dB above 50 Hz. Room contents can be assumed 'transparent' to sound if the ratio of wavelength to obstacle dimension is greater than 4 [33]. Surface and obstacle absorption might be expected to have an enhanced effect with the onset of tangential and oblique room modes.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of Room and Contents Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although flanking transmission downgrades the insulation offered by a party wall/floor, for the low frequency modal region considered, its significant effect would be one of limiting maxima and minima in sound level difference. The effect of flanking can be considered as an additional damping due to vibration losses at the room surfaces [33]. Modally reactive surfaces [34] were included in the FEM model, which however was designed to incorporate locally reactive surfaces only.…”
Section: Room Damping Due To Surface Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods requiring domain discretization such as the finite element method (FEM), the finite difference method, and the boundary element method (BEM), have not been widely used to compute the propagation of sound, because of the high computation cost entailed. The FEM [6] and the finite difference method [7] fail because the domain under consideration has to be fully discretized, and very fine meshes are needed to solve excitations at high frequencies. Methods like the BEM [8] are more efficient in terms of computer cost as they only require the discretization of the boundaries, but they involve a large computational effort, particularly for very high frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%