1996
DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed0703_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Cooperative and Mastery Learning Methods on Primary Grade Students' Learning and Retention of Economic Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also consider whether significant differences occurred in the changes in knowledge provided by each of the three interventions. Literature with regard to employer-sponsored financial education and with regard to technology use suggests that blending mastery and cooperative learning methods would yield higher achievement than cooperative and mastery approaches separately (e.g., Laney et al, 1996; Means et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also consider whether significant differences occurred in the changes in knowledge provided by each of the three interventions. Literature with regard to employer-sponsored financial education and with regard to technology use suggests that blending mastery and cooperative learning methods would yield higher achievement than cooperative and mastery approaches separately (e.g., Laney et al, 1996; Means et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through facilitation, children may develop new economic interpretations. Laney, Frerichs, Frerichs, and Pak (1996) demonstrated that a combined cooperative and mastery learning method prompts the most effective learning and retention process for economics at the primary grade levels. It appears that both student dialogues and teacher guidance represent necessary components to effective economic learning.…”
Section: Classroom Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Arredondo & Block (1990), when well implemented separately, both mastery learning and thinking skills programs appear to improve student learning. Although a great deal has been written about how mastery learning and other strategies might be used together extensively to produce positive learning outcomes (Blessing& Olufunke, 2015;Hevedanlı et al, 2002;Krank & Moon, 2001;Laney et al, 1996;Mevarech 1985;Özder 1996;Slavin 1983), there is the apparent lack of combining mastery learning with reflective thinking activities in the literature review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%