The effect of corporate governance quality and its mechanisms on firm philanthropic donations: evidence from the UK

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate whether and how better corporate governance practices can lead to philanthropic behavior among companies in the UK. In particular, this study attempts to determine whether corporate governance quality in general, as well as its specific mechanisms, affects corporate giving. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on a sample of Financial Times Stock Exchange All-Share nonfinancial companies. Data on firm donations, including donations amount and donations intensity, were manually collected from companies’ annual reports for the period 2018–2020. This paper uses panel data models to examine the research hypotheses. Findings The results of this study indicate that both donations amount and donations intensity are positively associated with the practice of better corporate governance. Board independence is positively associated with donations amount, but not with the intensity of donations. Furthermore, board size, board gender diversity and the establishment of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee are likely to have a positive impact on the amount and the intensity of firms’ donations. However, neither the chief executive officer board membership nor the audit committee’s independence is related to the firm’s donations. Practical implications This study sheds light on specific governance factors that affect firm donations in the context of UK companies. This allows regulators and legislators to evaluate the donations activities in the country and issue more directives to reinforce corporate governance practices that support corporate donations. In addition, the findings of this study are considered crucial to investors who prefer investing in companies with significant CSR-related activities to improve the value relevance of their investments. Originality/value This study provides a shred of unique evidence on the impact of corporate governance practices on firms’ donations.

Does media exposure moderate the relationship between ownership structure and environmental disclosure quality: evidence from Jordan

“…Two methods were used by the researchers to quantify the company ENVD namely: disclosure occurrence and disclosure abundance. Identifying the presence or the absence of information is the focus of the disclosure occurrence method, while the disclosure abundance method is based on the computation of the number of words, the number of sentences, or the number of pages per report (Joseph and Taplin, 2011; Ananzeh et al. , 2022a).…”

“…(1) The company's policy or concern toward the environment (2) Contribution to environmental protection and pollution control programs Two methods were used by the researchers to quantify the company ENVD namely: disclosure occurrence and disclosure abundance. Identifying the presence or the absence of information is the focus of the disclosure occurrence method, while the disclosure abundance method is based on the computation of the number of words, the number of sentences, or the number of pages per report (Joseph and Taplin, 2011;Ananzeh et al, 2022a). While the latter has been criticized as an imprecise tool to quantify the disclosure quantity as it can produce misleading results where some tables, graphs, and images may likely be neglected, the former is believed to promote a more constructive discussion on the main differences in the richness and diversity of environmental disclosure (Joseph and Taplin, 2011).…”

Board governance and audit report lag in the light of big data adoption: the case of Egypt

“…The four independent variables indicated by BG were board size, board diversity, board independence and CEO duality. Board size is determined by natural log of total number of directors on BOD (Albitar et al , 2020; Ananzeh et al , 2022; Albitar et al , 2022; Abdoush et al , 2022). Board independence measured by number of independent directors as a percentage of total board members (Elmarzouky et al , 2021; Hussainey et al , 2022; Shohaieb et al , 2022).…”

Do different dimensions of corporate social responsibility disclosure have different economic consequence: multi-approaches for profitability examination

“…Second, this paper adopts two theoretical perspectives to build the research hypotheses based on logical fundamentals. These theoretical perspectives include the agency theory and stakeholder theory (Freeman, 1984; Jones, 1995; Clarkson, 2016; Ananzeh et al , 2022a). Third, the paper uses different statistical techniques to examine the economic performance of CSRD and to ensure the validity of our results.…”