“…employed various aromatic phosphane ligands with meta ‐ or para ‐ substituents to evaluate their influence on the architecture of the SICCs. The reactions of 6, 7 or 8 equiv of tri(aryl)phosphane gold(I) ( S , R )‐2‐pyrrolidinone‐5‐carboxylate [Au(P(aryl) 3 )(( R , S )‐pyrrld)] (with aryl= m ‐FPh ( meta ‐fluorophenyl), m ‐tol ( meta ‐tolyl), p ‐tol ( para ‐tolyl), p ‐FPh ( para ‐fluorophenyl), or p ‐ClPh ( para ‐chlorophenyl)) dissolved in DCM with 1 or 2 equiv of [H] + 3 [α‐PMo 12 O 40 ] 3− , [H] + 3 [α‐PW 12 O 40 ] 3− , [H] + 4 [α‐SiMo 12 O 40 ] 4− , or [H] + 4 [α‐SiW 12 O 40 ] 4− dissolved in a layer of ethanol‐water mixture afford the SICCs [{Au(P( m ‐FPh) 3 )} 4 ( μ 4 ‐O)] 2+ 2 [{{Au(P( m ‐FPh) 3 )} 2 ( μ ‐OH)} 2 ] 2+ [α‐PMo 12 O 40 ] 3− 2 ( 25 ), [{Au(P( m ‐FPh) 3 )} 4 ( μ 4 ‐O)] 2+ 2 [α‐SiMo 12 O 40 ] 4− ( 26 ), [{Au(P( m ‐tol) 3 )} 4 ( μ 4 ‐O)] 2+ 2 [α‐SiW 12 O 40 ] 4− ( 27 ), [{Au(P( m ‐tol) 3 )} 4 ( μ 4 ‐O)] 2+ 2 [α‐SiMo 12 O 40 ] 4− ( 28 ), [{{Au(P( p ‐tol) 3 )} 2 ( μ ‐OH)} 2 ] 2+ 3 [α‐PW 12 O 40 ] 3− 2 ( 29 ), [{{Au(P( p ‐tol) 3 )} 2 ( μ ‐OH)} 2 ] 2+ 3 [α‐PMo 12 O 40 ] 3− 2 ( 30 ), [{{Au(P( p ‐FPh) 3 )} 2 ( μ ‐OH)} 2 ] 2+ 3 [α‐PMo 12 O 40 ] 3− 2 ( 31 ), [{{Au(P( p ‐ClPh) 3 )} 2 ( μ ‐OH)} 2 ] 2+ 3 [α‐PMo 12 O 40 ] 3− 2 ( 32 ), [{{Au(P( p ‐FPh) 3 )} 2 ( μ ‐OH)} 2 ] 2+ [α‐SiMo 12 O 40 {Au(P( p ‐FPh) 3 )}] 2− ( 33 ), or [{{Au(P( p ‐ClPh) 3 )} 2 ( μ ‐OH)} 2 ] 2+ [α‐SiMo 12 O 40 {Au(P( p ‐ClPh) 3 )}] 2− ( 34 ) with 35.9, 4.6, 71.4, 46.7, 78.0 %, a few %, 27.8, 73.4, 38.7, or 12.0 % yields, as crystals with the P , P , R , R , Ia d , Ia d , P , P , C 2/ c , or P space group symmetries (Figure ). A side product, not separable from 33 was detected upon crystallization, but not characterized.…”