2016
DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Country of Birth on the Pattern of Disease and Survival From Cervical Cancer

Abstract: Country of birth is not an independent prognostic indicator for cervical cancer survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The views and attitudes expressed by the Eastern European migrant women in this study suggest that they are not fully participating in cervical screening in England, supporting the findings from previous work in Birmingham that the majority of Eastern European migrant women had not attended screening prior to their cervical cancer diagnosis. 20 Because the uptake of cervical screening in their countries of birth is suboptimal, 21 there is also the potential that many of these women will not have been screened prior to migration. For example, the largest Eastern European population in England is from Poland, 22 where screening uptake is only 25%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The views and attitudes expressed by the Eastern European migrant women in this study suggest that they are not fully participating in cervical screening in England, supporting the findings from previous work in Birmingham that the majority of Eastern European migrant women had not attended screening prior to their cervical cancer diagnosis. 20 Because the uptake of cervical screening in their countries of birth is suboptimal, 21 there is also the potential that many of these women will not have been screened prior to migration. For example, the largest Eastern European population in England is from Poland, 22 where screening uptake is only 25%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…showed that insurance status is an independent predictor for poorer survival outcome, as it is related to late‐stage presentation and under‐treatment in the USA. Low socio‐economic and educational status are important factors, as compliance with cancer screening is significantly lower in this population, even in the UK, where screening is free to all irrespective of insurance status . Reasons for non‐compliance when access and finance are not an issue could be a lack of understanding of the natural history of cervical cancer and the role of screening, or because patient focus is more on prominent daily life issues and concerns rather than attending smear test invitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low socio-economic and educational status are important factors, as compliance with cancer screening is significantly lower in this population, even in the UK, where screening is free to all irrespective of insurance status. 22,23 Reasons for non-compliance when access and finance are not an issue could be a lack of understanding of the natural history of cervical cancer and the role of screening, or because patient focus is more on prominent daily life issues and concerns rather than attending smear test invitations. Practical barriers were raised more often by younger women, whereas older women had more negative attitudes to screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%