The Effect of Credit on Spending Decisions: The Role of the Credit Limit and Credibility

Abstract

The objective of the present research is to study consumer decisions to utilize a line of credit. The life-cycle hypothesis from economics argues that consumers should intertemporally reallocate their incomes over their life stream to maximize lifetime utility. One form of intertemporal allocation is to use past income (in the form of savings) in the future. A second form is the use of future income in the present. This can only be done if consumers have access to a temporary pool of money that they can draw from and replenish in the future—a function performed by consumer credit. However, our research reinforces prior findings that consumers are unable to correctly value their future incomes, and that they lack the cognitive capability to solve the intertemporal optimization problem required by the life-cycle hypothesis. Instead, we argue that consumers use information such as the credit limit as a signal of their future earnings potential. Specifically, if consumers have access to large amounts of credit, they are likely to infer that their lifetime income will be high and hence their willingness to use credit (and their spending) will also be high. Conversely, consumers who are granted lower amounts of credit are likely to infer that their lifetime income will be low and hence their spending will be lower. However, based on research in the area of consumer skepticism and inference making, we also argue for a moderating role of the credibility associated with the credit limit. Specifically, we argue that the above effect of credit availability would be particularly strong for consumers who believe that the credit limit credibly signals their future earnings potential (i.e., a naïve consumer who has limited experience with consumer credit). However, as consumers gain experience with credit, they start discounting credit availability as a predictor of their future and start questioning the validity of the process used to set the credit limit. Hence, with experience the effect of credit limit on the willingness to use credit should be attenuated. We test these predictions in five separate studies. In the first experimental study, we manipulate credit limit and credibility and pose subjects with a hypothetical purchase opportunity. Consistent with our prediction, credit limit impacted the propensity to spend, but only when the credibility was high. In the second experimental study, we replicate these findings even when subjects were given information about their expected future salaries, and also show that the credit limit influences their expectation of future earnings potential. In the third study, we show that the mere availability (and increase) of current liquidity cannot explain our findings. In the fourth study, we conduct a survey of consumers in which we measure a number of demographic characteristics and also ask them for their propensity to spend in a given purchase situation. In the fifth study we use the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) dataset, a triennial survey of U.S. families that is designed to ...

Do Payment Mechanisms Change the Way Consumers Perceive Products?

“…In study 3, participants in the credit card (cash) condition responded faster to benefits (costs) than to costs (benefits). This differential focus led credit card primed consumers to express higher reservation prices (studies 1-3) and also affected their product choices (study 4) relative to those primed with cash.T he use of a credit card as a payment mechanism increases the propensity to spend as compared to cash in otherwise identical purchase situations (Feinberg 1986;Hirschman 1979;Prelec and Simester 2001;Soman 2001;Soman and Cheema 2002), a finding typically referred to as the credit card premium. While prior research has explained the spending effects of different payment mechanisms by attributing them to memory processes (Soman 2001), decoupling of purchase from the pain of payment (Prelec and Loewenstein 1998), classical conditioning (Feinberg 1986), and processing fluency (Mishra, Mishra, and Nayakankuppam 2006), they remain silent as to consumers' product evaluations and choices.…”

Antecedents and Consequences of Household Financial Management in Brazilian Lower-Middle-Class

“…Consequently, individuals that use some sort of credit for payment may consume more. The question arises as to whether this will lead to greater consumption, which in turn causes them to become delinquent (Prelec & Lowenstein, 1998;Soman & Lam, 2002;Soman & Cheema, 2002;Kirchler et al, 2008;Raghubir & Srivastava, 2008;Ponchio, 2006).…”

Credit card spending limit and personal finance: system dynamics approach

“…Soman and Cheema [22] made several experiments about the effect of credit on a spending decision and they found that a higher credit limit on credit card spending increases spending especially for some groups of users (younger consumers and less educated consumers). The study of credit card debt among college students showed interesting results [17,18].…”

“…The objective of the paper is to study the impact of the credit card limit on the long-term budget available for spending with the usage of the system dynamics approach, with the presumption that a higher credit limit on credit card spending will decrease the long-term budget available for spending [18,22]. To test this presumption, we used a system dynamics model of the credit card impact on the budget available for spending, which is developed by Ratha [20] as part of the Road Maps program.…”