1995
DOI: 10.1002/app.1995.070550314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of crystallization conditions on the properties of polyoxymethylene

Abstract: SYNOPSISMeasurements using compact tension specimens machined from compression and injectionmolded plaques of polyoxymethylene show a systematic decrease in the plane-strain critical stress intensity K,, for crack initiation with crystallization temperature and with molecular weight, but little change in the yield stress in plane strain compression tests. The variation in with crystallization temperature has been accounted for in terms of the effective entanglement density in the damage zone ahead of the crack… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the DSC endotherms, the lamellar thickness l of the samples was calculated on the basis of Gibbs–Thomson equation: Tm=Tm012σeΔh0lwhere T m 0 is the equilibrium melting temperature, Δ h 0 is thermodynamic enthalpy of fusion per unit volume of the crystalline phase, and σ e is the free surface energy of the end faces lamellar that is associated with the crystallization process. The values of T m 0 , Δ h 0 , and σ e for POM assumed in the previous equation for calculating the lamellar thickness were 200 °C, 380 × 10 6 J/m 3 , and 0.125 J/m 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the DSC endotherms, the lamellar thickness l of the samples was calculated on the basis of Gibbs–Thomson equation: Tm=Tm012σeΔh0lwhere T m 0 is the equilibrium melting temperature, Δ h 0 is thermodynamic enthalpy of fusion per unit volume of the crystalline phase, and σ e is the free surface energy of the end faces lamellar that is associated with the crystallization process. The values of T m 0 , Δ h 0 , and σ e for POM assumed in the previous equation for calculating the lamellar thickness were 200 °C, 380 × 10 6 J/m 3 , and 0.125 J/m 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the next stage, the lamellar thickness l of the samples was calculated using Gibbs‐Thomson equation41, 42: where T italicm0 is the equilibrium melting temperature, Δ h 0 is thermodynamic enthalpy of fusion per unit volume of the crystalline phase, and σ e is the free surface energy of the end faces lamellar that is associated with the crystallization process. The values of T italicm0, Δ h 0 , and σ e for POM assumed in the above equation for calculating the lamellar thickness were 200°C,43 380 × 10 6 J m −3 ,44 and 0.125 J m −2 ,45 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of a semicrystalline polymer are often limited by the high level of crystallinity, accompanied by brittleness and low-impact resistance [1,2]. However, this problem can be overcome by blending the thermoplastic with an elastomeric modifier, which in turn will also improve the polymer's toughness.…”
Section: Polymer Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%