2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01750.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cutting and fish‐orientation systems on the deheading yield of carp

Abstract: Applied research into carp-deheading yield indicated that the V-cut with two circular knives averaged 77.9%; the V-cut with one cup-type knife -75.6%, and the straight cut at a 79°angle to the fish backbone -77.4%. The yield averages for deheaded and gutted carp were 63.6%, 62.4% and 62.9%, respectively. Standard analysis of variance demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences between the mean yields of these three deheading systems. Furthermore, the potential influence of the fish-or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the fish cutting route was typically along a straight line to simplify the cutting process. 39 However, identifying the curves and profile boundaries of the target would be the optimal strategy to maximize the meat yield and avoid the protein waste. Five state-of-the-art deep learning models were thus selected for further analysis and comparison based on their performances of catfish semantic segmentation, including BEiTV1, 40 SegFormer-B0 and SegFormer-B5, 41 ViT-Adapter, 42 and PSPNet 43 with the resized/unified input image size of 640x640 across all models (Table 3).…”
Section: Deep Learning Models For Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the fish cutting route was typically along a straight line to simplify the cutting process. 39 However, identifying the curves and profile boundaries of the target would be the optimal strategy to maximize the meat yield and avoid the protein waste. Five state-of-the-art deep learning models were thus selected for further analysis and comparison based on their performances of catfish semantic segmentation, including BEiTV1, 40 SegFormer-B0 and SegFormer-B5, 41 ViT-Adapter, 42 and PSPNet 43 with the resized/unified input image size of 640x640 across all models (Table 3).…”
Section: Deep Learning Models For Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize the commercial values, the deheading machines should leave the maximum amount of meat on the fillet and ensure no part of the fish gills, and the head skeleton is included in the fillet [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. The main deheading position can be classified into four classes, as shown in Figure 1 , namely straight cutting, slant cutting, V-cutting, and round cutting along the gill area [ 43 , 44 ]. Commercial machines, like Baader 166, have been used in industry and research [ 39 ].…”
Section: Modern Fish Cuttingmentioning
confidence: 99%