2018
DOI: 10.22495/cocv15i2art6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cyber-attacks on stock returns

Abstract: A widely debated issue in recent years is cybercrime. Breaches in the security of accessibility, integrity and confidentiality of information involve potentially high explicit and implicit costs for firms. This paper investigates the impact of information security breaches on stock returns. Using event-study methodology, the study provides empirical evidence on the effect of announcements of cyber-attacks on the market value of firms from 1995 to 2015. Results show that substantial negative market returns occu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the CAPM (Table , Panel A), the statistical results pertaining to each of the event windows in the proximity of the announcement date, namely (−1, 1), (−3, 1), (−2, 1), (−2, 0), (−2, −1), suggest that there is a statistically significant drop in value in anticipation of the breach announcement. These results differ from those described by Arcuri et al (), who find that substantial negative returns follow the announcement of breaches. Our observations are based on the results of the Patell test, the standardized cross‐sectional test, and the skewness corrected test.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the CAPM (Table , Panel A), the statistical results pertaining to each of the event windows in the proximity of the announcement date, namely (−1, 1), (−3, 1), (−2, 1), (−2, 0), (−2, −1), suggest that there is a statistically significant drop in value in anticipation of the breach announcement. These results differ from those described by Arcuri et al (), who find that substantial negative returns follow the announcement of breaches. Our observations are based on the results of the Patell test, the standardized cross‐sectional test, and the skewness corrected test.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Their analysis suggests that the effect of the breach on the attacked firm varies over time. Arcuri, Brogi, and Gandolfi () find that substantial negative returns follow the announcement of breaches, with financial firms incurring the greatest negative return. They also posit a link between cybercrime and insider trading.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] states that the nature of the breach influences Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR), while [25] and [9] find that the nature of the attack is not a determinant of CAR. In general, there is a consensus that the announcement of a security breach leads to negative CAR [26]. [27] show that data breaches have a negative and statistically significant impact on a company's market value on the announcement day.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%