2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Damage Functions on Urban Flood Damage Appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any function can be a candidate for the damage function as long as it satisfies the above requirements. For example, the application of the flood damage function shown below uses three typical, but different, functions that were found through a literature survey: (1) quadratic function (Merz et al, 2010), (2) exponential function (Notaro et al, 2014) and (3) S-shape function (Totschnig et al, 2011). All are considered appropriate for providing the damage ratio of flood affected crops and are simple enough to match uncertainties in other factors related to damage assessment such as estimated inundation depth and flood disaster statistics that are used to calibrate function parameters.…”
Section: Identifying Flood Damage Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any function can be a candidate for the damage function as long as it satisfies the above requirements. For example, the application of the flood damage function shown below uses three typical, but different, functions that were found through a literature survey: (1) quadratic function (Merz et al, 2010), (2) exponential function (Notaro et al, 2014) and (3) S-shape function (Totschnig et al, 2011). All are considered appropriate for providing the damage ratio of flood affected crops and are simple enough to match uncertainties in other factors related to damage assessment such as estimated inundation depth and flood disaster statistics that are used to calibrate function parameters.…”
Section: Identifying Flood Damage Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floods are considered the most devastating and frequently occurring hazards in the world (IPCC, 2014;UNISDR, 2009). That is why it has attracted the attention of many researchers and organizations, trying to appraise and assess the risks involved in order to stem its excesses and guard against future consequences (Dutta et al, 2003(Dutta et al, , 2013Herath and Wang, 2009;Bormudoi et al, 2011;Mohammadi et al, 2014;Notaro et al, 2014). The general shift of focus from flood hazard control to flood risk assessment has propelled the active involvement and interest in flood impact assessment and economic damage estimation (Bubeck et al, 2011;Ke et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the economic analyses of the damages are done through either survey questionnaires after a particular flood events, insurance claim or construction costs. Fourthly, the stage-damage curve (also called vulnerability curve) is established; this is the widely accepted common method for estimating potential flood damage (Notaro et al, 2014). Stagedamage curve can be constructed using either empirical or synthetic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although mathematical models have been much improved in recent years, like all procedures based on a conceptualized representation of the real drainage system behaviour, its predictions are affected by a degree of inherent uncertainty [9][10][11][12]. Moreover, flooding damage functions are usually affected by significant uncertainty intrinsically related to the collected data and to the simplified structure of the adopted functional laws [6,13]. As results flood damage evaluation is generally affected by a high level of uncertainty due to the accumulation of several uncertainty sources (e.g., intrinsic model uncertainty, uncertainty due to damage appraisal, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%