At perceptual threshold, some stimuli are available for conscious access whereas others are not. Such threshold inputs are useful tools for investigating the events that separate conscious awareness from unconscious stimulus processing. Here, viewing unmasked, threshold-duration images was combined with recording magnetoencephalography to quantify differences among perceptual states, ranging from no awareness to ambiguity to robust perception. A four-choice scale was used to assess awareness: "didn't see" (no awareness), "couldn't identify" (awareness without identification), "unsure" (awareness with low certainty identification), and "sure" (awareness with high certainty identification). Stimulus-evoked neuromagnetic signals were grouped according to behavioral response choices. Three main cortical responses were elicited. The earliest response, peaking at ∼100 ms after stimulus presentation, showed no significant correlation with stimulus perception. A late response (∼290 ms) showed moderate correlation with stimulus awareness but could not adequately differentiate conscious access from its absence. By contrast, an intermediate response peaking at ∼240 ms was observed only for trials in which stimuli were consciously detected. That this signal was similar for all conditions in which awareness was reported is consistent with the hypothesis that conscious visual access is relatively sharply demarcated.cognition | vision C onscious visual representations must be generated rapidly enough to affect behavior advantageously. Thus, vision must be fast. However, the network activation that supports visual perception is complex and involves many spatially segregated brain areas (1). As a result, certain integration delays must ensue for successful perceptual analysis to be achieved. An experimental paradigm was thus designed to address the temporal and neuronal conditions required for a rapid, high-level visual response.Several previous studies suggest that visual perception relies primarily on the early activation of occipital cortices (2-4). Others show that it results from the late activation (5, 6) of temporal (7), parietal, and frontal areas (8). Finally, others indicate that perception is associated with a midlatency evoked response (9), the timing of which can be delayed when stimulus energy is decreased to near-threshold levels (10,11).These conflicting findings demonstrate the unresolved nature of the timing underlying visual perception. Moreover, varied interpretations of the term "perception" may contribute to varied interpretations of the neuronal processes being studied, making it more difficult to understand the timing of cognitive events generated by the brain. To avoid such errors in communication, we define the term perception to mean the conscious awareness or detection of a presented visual stimulus: a phenomenon not to be confused with related processes such as visual identification and recognition. Although our definition is limited to the event in which a visual stimulus achieves conscious access, ...