1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1997.96000543.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of defocus on edge contrast sensitivity

Abstract: The effect of optical blur (defocus) on edge contrast sensitivity was studied. Edge contrast sensitivity detoriates with fairly small amounts of blur (approximately 0.5 D) and is roughly reduced by half for each dioptre of blur. The effect of blur on edge contrast sensitivity equals the effect of blur on sine wave contrast sensitivity for a spatial frequency of approximately 3 cpd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…12 cpd, and for detecting edges, i.e. 3 cpd (King‐Smith and Kulikowski, 1972; Jansonius and Kooijman, 1997). Because the measured dioptric range was limited on the negative side, the depth of focus was defined as twice the positive half of the dioptric range in which the contrast sensitivity exceeded half its maximum value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…12 cpd, and for detecting edges, i.e. 3 cpd (King‐Smith and Kulikowski, 1972; Jansonius and Kooijman, 1997). Because the measured dioptric range was limited on the negative side, the depth of focus was defined as twice the positive half of the dioptric range in which the contrast sensitivity exceeded half its maximum value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Therefore, their data with a 3‐mm pupil are in agreement with ours. Jansonius and Kooijman (1997) took measurements in six subjects not administered cycloplegic drugs. The natural pupil size of their population varied between 4.5 and 7 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations