1990
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.10-08-02825.1990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of depolarization on expression of the human proenkephalin gene is synergistic with cAMP and dependent upon a cAMP-inducible enhancer

Abstract: Membrane depolarization is a critical component of neural signaling; in recent years there also has been a great deal of evidence that membrane depolarization can regulate neural gene expression. Therefore, excitatory neurotransmission may be an important mechanism of neural plasticity. We have investigated the intracellular pathways and DNA regulatory elements through which membrane depolarization activates expression of the neural gene encoding human proenkephalin. In PC12 and C6-glioma cells, depolarization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in both cardiocytes (Figure 1, middle panel) and GH3 cells (Figure 1, lower panel), depolarization did not increase the steady-state levels of the transcripts coding for ICER. Thus, in contrast with previous observations in which depolarization and cAMP stimulation had a concordant effect on the steady-state levels of several transcripts, including c-fos, proenkephalin and Kv1.5 [24][25][26], here we demonstrated a discordant response. cAMP induced the expression of ICER transcripts, whereas depolarization had no effect on the steadystate levels of ICER transcript.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, in both cardiocytes (Figure 1, middle panel) and GH3 cells (Figure 1, lower panel), depolarization did not increase the steady-state levels of the transcripts coding for ICER. Thus, in contrast with previous observations in which depolarization and cAMP stimulation had a concordant effect on the steady-state levels of several transcripts, including c-fos, proenkephalin and Kv1.5 [24][25][26], here we demonstrated a discordant response. cAMP induced the expression of ICER transcripts, whereas depolarization had no effect on the steadystate levels of ICER transcript.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane depolarization can induce the transcription of immediate early genes, such as c-fos, and other genes, such as proenkephalin and Kv1.5 [24][25][26]. This induction is mediated by a Ca# + \calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, which phosphorylates CREB on the same residue as PKA [31], explaining the concordant transcriptional response of several genes to cAMP and depolarization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, activation of the cyclic AMP pathway has been shown to be necessary and sufficient for induction of CREB-regulated genes in several transformed cell lines (Nguyen et al, 1990). Thus, it is somewhat puzzling that amphetamine-mediated induction of c-fos and zif 268 gene expression has been reported to be inhibited by NMDA receptor antagonists in vivo (Snyder-Keller, 1991;Ohno et al, 1994;Wang et al, 1994).…”
Section: Abstract: Dopamine; Amphetamine; Nmda; Striatum; Immediate mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ca2+ mediates gene induction in response to membrane depolarization of various neuronal cell lines and this inducibility has been mapped to CRE-like elements in different promoters (Sheng et al, 1988;Nguyen et al, 1990). In addition, rapid phosphorylation of CREB at has been demonstrated in response to membrane stimulation (Sheng et al, 1991) (Sheng et al, 1991;Dash et al, 1991).…”
Section: Crebmentioning
confidence: 99%