ICON3 trial results have suggested that CAP and carboplatin -taxol regimens as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) yield similar survival. We explored the impact of increased dose of cyclophosphamide in a modified CAP regimen on the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of AOC patients. From February 1994 to June 1997, 164 patients were randomised to receive six cycles every 3 weeks of either standard CEP (S) combining cyclophosphamide (C), 500 mg m À2 , epirubicin (E) 50 mg m À2 , and cisplatin (P) 75 mg m À2 or intensive CEP (I) with E and P at the same doses, but with (C) 1800 mg m À2 and filgrastim 5 mg kg À1 per day  10 days. Response was evaluated at second-look surgery. Patient characteristics were well balanced. Except for grade 3 -4 neutropaenia (S: 54%, I: 38% of cycles), Arm1 presented a significantly more important toxicity: infection requiring antibiotics, grade 3 -4 thrombocytopaenia, anaemia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis. Median follow-up was 84 months. DFS (15.9 vs 14.8 months) and OS (33 vs 30 months) were not significantly different between S and I (P40.05). Increasing cyclophosphamide dose by more than 3 times with filgrastim support in the modified CAP regimen CEP induces more toxicity but not better efficacy in AOC. British Journal of Cancer (2007) Advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is considered one of the most chemotherapy-sensitive epithelial malignant tumours (Ozols and Young, 1991;Trimble et al, 1994). First-line regimens with a platinum salt used alone or in combination (McGuire et al, 1996;Muggia et al, 2000) induce objective response in more than half of the patients. However, a majority ultimately relapse after a median interval which rarely exceeds 18 months (McGuire et al, 1996) suggesting the need of new therapeutic regimens.In the 1990s, the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel was established as first-line therapy for AOC patients after two large phase III trials had demonstrated the superiority of this combination over the then standard regimen of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin (McGuire et al, 1996; Piccart et al, 2000). A number of studies have evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as an alternative to the paclitaxel -cisplatin regimen (Neijt et al, 2000;Bookman et al, 2003;Ozols et al, 2003). They have shown that the carboplatin combination is associated with a lower incidence of non-haematologic toxicities (particularly neurotoxicity) and better quality of life, whereas no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was detected. From these findings, the International Consensus Conference in Ovarian cancer, held in Baden-Baden in 2004, concluded that carboplatin -paclitaxel was the first-line standard for AOC treatment.This consensus however has been challenged by the results of two randomised trials comparing platinum -paclitaxel to alternative regimens. The GOG 132 study compared cisplatin alone (100 mg m À2 ), paclitaxel alone (200 mg m À2 over 24 h), and the combination ...