1997
DOI: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00293.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Dietary Energy Restriction on Body Weight Gain and the Development of Noninsulin‐Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM) in Psammomys obesus

Abstract: Food intake was restricted to 75% of ad libitum levels in 37 male Psammomys obesus (Israeli Sand Rats) from the ages of 4 (weaning) to 10 weeks. Energy restriction reduced the mean bodyweight at 10 weeks by 29% compared with 44 ad libitum fed controls. Hyperglycemia was prevented completely in the food-restricted group, and mean blood glucose concentrations were significantly reduced (3.8 * 0.2 vs. 5.5 * 0.4 pmoVL; pe0.05) compared with control animals. Plasma insulin concentrations were also decreased signifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adipose tissue produces and secretes a large number of hormones, cytokines, and proteins that affect glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity, including leptin, TNF-a, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) c, resistin, and adiponectin [28,29]. Previous studies have shown that reduction of body weight by caloric restriction [30][31][32], surgical removal of intra-abdominal fat pads [33,34], or oral administration of a-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose [35,36] results in improvement of insulin actions in obese rodent models including OLETF rats. Therefore, it is possible that the effects of camostat in OLETF rats observed in the present study are based on weight loss or failure of weight gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adipose tissue produces and secretes a large number of hormones, cytokines, and proteins that affect glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity, including leptin, TNF-a, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) c, resistin, and adiponectin [28,29]. Previous studies have shown that reduction of body weight by caloric restriction [30][31][32], surgical removal of intra-abdominal fat pads [33,34], or oral administration of a-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose [35,36] results in improvement of insulin actions in obese rodent models including OLETF rats. Therefore, it is possible that the effects of camostat in OLETF rats observed in the present study are based on weight loss or failure of weight gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 In the gerbil, Psammomys obesus, dietary energy restriction to slow weight gain has also had powerful effects to prevent hyperglycemia, although some hyperinsulinemia still developed under calorie restraint. 85…”
Section: Can the Metabolic Syndrome X Be Prevented‐and By What Means?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a laboratory setting, on a diet of normal laboratory chow, a signi®cant proportion of these animals develop hyperinsulinaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, hypercholesterolaemia and elevated leptin levels, making it a unique model of obesity and NIDDM. 11,12,14 The phenotypic range of body weight and plasma leptin concentrations in Psammomys obesus make it more analogous to human obesity than the single-gene mutant models such as obaob mice. Therefore the ®ndings of these studies may be particularly relevant to the use of leptin as a therapeutic agent for human obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that these animals had signi®cantly greater body fat content than those classi®ed as lean (body weight`190 g at 12 weeks of age). 11,12,14 Experimental protocol A group of Psammomys obesus were housed individually and followed for at least a 7 d period, with free access to food and water, to establish baseline data for food intake (measured by the rate of disappearance), body weight, blood glucose and plasma insulin concentrations. The animals were characterised (as described above) into lean or obese groups (n 24 in each group).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%