The effect of different COVID-19 public health restrictions on mobility: A systematic review

Abstract

Background In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries have introduced non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as stay-at-home orders, to reduce person-to-person contact and break trains of transmission. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of different public health restrictions on mobility across different countries and cultures. The University of Bern COVID-19 Living Evidence database of COVID-19 and SARS-COV-2 publications was searched for retrospective or prospective studies evaluating the impact of COVID-19 public health restrictions on Google Mobility. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by two authors. Information from included studies was extracted by one researcher and double checked by another. Risk of bias of included articles was assessed using the Newcastle Ottowa Scale. Given the heterogeneous nature of the designs used, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. From the search, 1672 references were identified, of which 14 were included in the narrative synthesis. All studies reported data from the first wave of the pandemic, with Google Mobility Scores included from January to August 2020, with most studies analysing data during the first two months of the pandemic. Seven studies were assessed as having a moderate risk of bias and seven as a low risk of bias. Countries that introduced more stringent public health restrictions experienced greater reductions in mobility, through increased time at home and reductions in visits to shops, workplaces and use of public transport. Stay-at-home orders were the most effective of the individual strategies, whereas mask mandates had little effect of mobility. Conclusions Public health restrictions, particularly stay-at-home orders have significantly impacted on transmission prevention behaviours. Further research is required to understand how to effectively address pandemic fatigue and to support the safe return back to normal day-to-day behaviours.

The relationship between new PCR positive cases and going out in public during the COVID-19 epidemic in Japan

“…Firstly, the policies offered by the government influenced people’s behavior; a state of emergency was not declared and the messages from the government in the second wave were not as strong or directive in comparison with its communication during the first wave. The results are consistent with previous research showing that different messages have different effects [ 37 , 51 , 67 , 68 ]. Secondly, the “Go to Travel” and “Go to Eat” campaigns that encouraged people to go out may have influenced people’s behavior.…”

Sedentary behaviour, physical activity, and sleep among office workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Brazil and Sweden

“…The changes in physical behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic likely differed between countries due to different social restrictions adopted in order to slow down the transmission of the virus [ 16 , 17 ]. Thus, the severity of restrictions has varied between countries, for instance regarding the distance people could travel from their homes, and the allowances for outdoor activity [ 18 ]. In contrast to many other countries implementing quite restricted and mandatory measures, the authorities in Brazil and Sweden largely relied on recommendations and voluntary measures, as implemented through individual responsibility.…”

Assessing the Impact of a New Urban Greenway Using Mobile, Wearable Technology-Elicited Walk- and Bike-Along Interviews

“…Across the globe, people were advised to stay at home and avoid contact with individuals outside their households. Lockdowns and physical distancing measures restricted access to gyms, parks, playgrounds and other avenues where people could be physically active [8].…”