The Effect of Different Irrigation Levels and Mulch Application on Some Quality Criteria in Table Tomatoes (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.)

Karaer, Murat; Kuşçu, Hayrettin; Gültaş, Hüseyin Tevfik

doi:10.15666/aeer/1804_54375447

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There was significant increase in the diameter and length of tomato due to mulching (Zhang et al, 2019). This result is in line with the result obtained Karear et al (2020), who reported that fruit diameter increased using mulching in tomato. (Sarmah et al, 2022).…”

Section: Effect Of Mulching and Nitrogen Dose On Fruit Length (Mm) An...supporting

confidence: 93%

Graded level of nitrogen and mulching effect on growth and yield parameters of tomato in Arghakhanchi, Nepal

Kafle

Khatri

Budhathoki

et al. 2023

Arch. Agric. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A field experiment was carried out to find out the effect of different levels of nitrogen and mulching on growth and yield parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) var. VL443 at commercial tomato farm in Sandhikharkha, Arghakhanchi from February – June 2022. The eight treatments were laid out in two factorial RCBD with three replications. The treatment combinations were T1 (Non-mulching with 0 kgha-1), T2 (Non-mulching with 50 kgha-1), T3 (Non- mulching with 100 kgha-1), T4 (Non-mulching with 150 kgha-1), T5 (Mulching with 0 kgha-1), T6 (Mulching with 50 kgha-1), T7 (Mulching with 100 kgha-1), and T8 (Mulching with 150 kgha-1). Growth parameters, yield, and yield attributing traits were recorded. The result indicated that the 150 kgha-1 dose of N application contributes to the higher plant height (178.13 cm), the number of leaves (47.83), fruit length (72.50 mm), fruit diameter (58.83 mm), Individual fruit weight (71.67 g) and yield (2.51 kg/ plant). Similarly, plastic mulch contributes significantly higher plant height (173.6 cm), the number of leaves (47.30), fruit length (68.84 mm), fruit diameter (54.20 mm), Individual fruit weight (72.52 g) and yield (2.53 kg/ plant) as compared to non-mulched condition. Furthermore, fruit yield per hectare in mulching with 150 kg-1 plot was significantly higher in comparison to non-mulching with 0 kgha-1 plot. So, the application of 150 kgha-1 nitrogen along with plastic mulching is recommended to increase the yield of tomatoes under the plastic tunnels in Arghakhanchi.

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Mulching and Nitrogen Dose On Fruit Length (Mm) An...supporting

confidence: 93%

Graded level of nitrogen and mulching effect on growth and yield parameters of tomato in Arghakhanchi, Nepal

Kafle

Khatri

Budhathoki

et al. 2023

Arch. Agric. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It can be said that the WP and IWP values were increased with by more frequent irrigation applications. A similar range of WP and IWP values of processing tomato was reported by [36] as 13.1-21.6 kg m -3 (WP) and 19.6-30.3 kg m -3 (IWP) and by [35] as 12.0-25.7 kg m -3 (WP) and 13.5-30.6 kg m -3 (IWP). On the contrary, different ranges were determined for the WP and IWP respectively by [37] as 9.9-12.7 kg m -3 and 11.4-33 kg m -3 , by [38] as 3.53-7.17 kg m -3 and 3.61-6.87 kg m -3 and by [39] as 28.0-29.4 kg m -3 (WP).…”

Section: B Fruit Yield Water and Irrigation Water Productivitysupporting

confidence: 81%

“…[33] reported a range between 22.7-72.2 t ha -1 for the yield of tomato plant. In another study conducted in semi-arid climatic zone by [35], the highest yields reported as 72.56 t ha -1 and 68.95 t ha -1 for the first and second year of study.…”

Section: B Fruit Yield Water and Irrigation Water Productivitymentioning

confidence: 91%

“…[41] and [42] stated that brix values of tomato increase as the applied irrigation water decreases. [35] reported that irrigation levels*mulch interactions had significant effects on brix value at p<0.01 level and determined the maximum brix value as 7.66, while the lowest value as 6.45. [43] found a range between 5.57 and 6.78 for the brix value of tomato under Mediterranean climate conditions.…”

Section: Quality Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Farklı Sulama Aralıkları ve Düzeylerinin Salçalık Domatesin Verim ve Kalite Bileşenlerine Etkileri ve Ekonomik Analizi

ELMAS

Yetik

Kuşçu

2023

Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was carried out to determine the effects of different irrigation intervals (II) and irrigation levels (IL) on yield, quality and net income values of processing tomato cultivation in a sub-humid climatic zone in 2019. A split-plot randomized complete block design with three replicates was used for the field experiments. The II4-days (A) and 8-days (B) were determined as main-plot factor and different IL were established according to 100% (T1), 80% (T2) and 60% (T3) of the cumulative evaporation occurring in the Class A pan were determined as the sub-plot factor. Seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ET) values varied between 419 and 527 mm. The effects of different irrigation strategies on fruit yield, average fruit weight, brix and water productivity values of processing tomato were significant at the p<0.01 level. The greatest fruit yield was obtained in AT1 treatment with 111.65 t ha-1. The highest water and irrigation water productivity values were obtained from AT2 as 22.4 kg m-3 and 31.4 kg m-3 and the lowest values from BT3 treatment as 16.1 kg m-3 and 26.0 kg m-3 respectively. The yield response factor (ky) was determined as 1.7 for the growing season. The net income values of different treatments ranged from 213.49 to 5557.54 $ ha-1 and the net income increased with the augmentation inthe irrigation water applied. Based on the study results, AT1 treatment was recommended to obtain maximum fruit yield and net income. However, in locations with limited water resources, AT2 treatment which provides a reasonable balance between quality components and water requirements can also be evaluated.

show abstract

“…The 0-40 cm soil moisture of I3 irrigation treatment of spring tomato and autumn tomato was about 6.14% and 3.79% higher than that of I2 treatment under MSPF, respectively; the soil water-filled porosity increased, weakening the active oxygen metabolism of crops, limiting the activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes, and having a negative effect on tomato yield [40]. This is not consistent with the conclusions of Bush [47], Li [48], and Karaer [49], namely that tomato yield increases with the increase in irrigation amount in drip irrigation. This may be due to the difference of irrigation amount control.…”

Section: Effect Of Different Irrigation Amount On Soil Water Heat And...mentioning

confidence: 63%

Changes of Soil Water and Heat Transport and Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in Greenhouses with Micro-Sprinkler Irrigation under Plastic Film

Zhang

Liu³

et al. 2022

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to expound the changes in soil water flow, heat transport, and tomato production under micro-sprinkler irrigation and plastic film (MSPF) conditions. The effects of different irrigation amounts (I1:0.7 Epan; I2:1.0 Epan; and I3:1.2 Epan (Epan is the cumulative evaporation from a 20 cm diameter standard pan, mm)) on soil water, soil temperature, and tomato yield were studied. A completely randomized trial design was used; meanwhile, the drip irrigation under plastic film (CK1) and micro-sprinkler irrigation without mulch film (CK2) were used as controls. The results showed that the shape of soil moisture was banded under MSPF; the soil wetting range was larger than that of CK1 and CK2 in the profile of MSPF. The change range of 5 cm soil temperature of MSPF 1–5 days after irrigation was 4.05 °C. The change range of 5 cm soil temperature of MSPF was lower than that of CK1 from 1 to 5 days after irrigation. During the growth period of spring and autumn tomato, the average soil moisture content of 0–40 cm with CK1 was 1.97% and 3.83% (spring and autumn, respectively) higher than that of MSPF, and the average soil temperature of 5–25 cm was 2.36% and 1.66% (spring and autumn, respectively) lower than that of MSPF. Compared with CK2, the average soil moisture content of 0–40 cm under MSPF increased by 8.30% and 3.83% (spring and autumn, respectively), and the average soil temperature of 5–25 cm under MSPF increased by 5.85% and 1.68% (spring and autumn, respectively). The spring and autumn tomato yield of MSPF was significantly higher than that of CK1 by 19.39% and 4.54%, respectively. The spring and autumn tomato yield of MSPF were higher than that of CK2 by about 20.46% and 49.22%, respectively. With an increase in the irrigation amount of MSPF, the soil moisture and yield of spring and autumn tomato increase; the soil temperature and water use efficiency of spring and autumn tomato decrease. Considered comprehensively, the MSPF can be used as one of the methods of greenhouse tomato micro-irrigation, and 1.0 Epan is recommended for irrigation parameters in northwest China facility agriculture.

show abstract

The Effect of Different Irrigation Levels and Mulch Application on Some Quality Criteria in Table Tomatoes (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.)

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Graded level of nitrogen and mulching effect on growth and yield parameters of tomato in Arghakhanchi, Nepal

Graded level of nitrogen and mulching effect on growth and yield parameters of tomato in Arghakhanchi, Nepal

Farklı Sulama Aralıkları ve Düzeylerinin Salçalık Domatesin Verim ve Kalite Bileşenlerine Etkileri ve Ekonomik Analizi

Changes of Soil Water and Heat Transport and Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in Greenhouses with Micro-Sprinkler Irrigation under Plastic Film

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About