1990
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540110805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of diffuse functions on minimal basis set superposition errors for H‐bonded dimers

Abstract: The effect of the addition of diffuse functions of sp type on the first row atoms (andlor of d type on phosphorus) to a MINI-1 minimal basis set is evaluated by comparing the SCF description of the interaction energy and its decomposition, counterpoise (CP) corrected and uncorrected for basis set superposition errors (BSSEs), with that produced by extended basis sets (6-31G** and 3-21G+) as well as by basis sets (6-31G** + VPs and 6-31G** + VPs (2d)S), previously successfully tested, designed to minimize the B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these large stabilization energies are the result of the incomplete description of the separated reactants that is achieved when a relatively small basis set such as 3-21G or 3-21G* is used. This is termed basis set superposition error (BSSE) (30), which has been discussed extensively in connection with calculations on water clusters (31). The BSSE leads to energies of separated reactants that are artificially too high, causing AE * and AH* to be too low or even negative, when these are calculated from the separated reactants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these large stabilization energies are the result of the incomplete description of the separated reactants that is achieved when a relatively small basis set such as 3-21G or 3-21G* is used. This is termed basis set superposition error (BSSE) (30), which has been discussed extensively in connection with calculations on water clusters (31). The BSSE leads to energies of separated reactants that are artificially too high, causing AE * and AH* to be too low or even negative, when these are calculated from the separated reactants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three difference basis set predicted similar result for the relative energies of CCM monomers, but the binding energies (E binding ) of CCM/SeO 3 2− adduct showed large difference. Because the basis set extension accompanies with reducing extant of basis set superposition error BSSE, especially the adding diffuse functions is definitely beneficial effect in anion-neutral system 63 64 65 . The BSSE calculated by counterpoise method 66 67 can demonstrate this phenomenon (see “BSSE and selection of basis set” of support materials ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of polarization functions has already been carried out 22 as well as of minimal basis sets augmented with diffuse functions …”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%