1986
DOI: 10.1093/applin/7.2.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of Lectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
142
5
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
142
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From the beginning (Chaudron and Richards, 1986), the findings of this research are potential input for instructional materials, curriculum design and teacher training. This section provides an overview of some aspects revealed by this research which may be beneficial for CLIL/EMI lecturers.…”
Section: Second Language (Academic) Listening Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the beginning (Chaudron and Richards, 1986), the findings of this research are potential input for instructional materials, curriculum design and teacher training. This section provides an overview of some aspects revealed by this research which may be beneficial for CLIL/EMI lecturers.…”
Section: Second Language (Academic) Listening Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most frequent methodology followed similar steps in all cases. First, an experimental group received A lecture with DMs and a control group received the same lecture without them (Chaudron and Richards, 1986;Flowerdew and Tauroza, 1995;Morell, 2004;Eslami and Eslami-Rasekh, 2007;Reza et al, 2012 inter ali.). The second step was to check students´ comprehension by different means (questions, tests or the notes taken).…”
Section: Formal Elements Facilitating Lecture Comprehension: Discoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The understanding of academic lectures was found to depend less on the meaning of individual sentences, and more on their inter-relatedness and the structure of the whole text (Dunkel & Davis, 1994). Clear discourse markers can significantly improve the comprehension of L2 listeners (Chaudron & Richards, 1986). Therefore, listening materials should be graded.…”
Section: Materials Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for comprehension of the lectures. In this sense, Chaudron and Richards (1986) report that overusing micro-markers (so, actually, well, right) may be distracting within the overall coherence of the lecture while macro-markers (to begin with, this meant that and in this way) increase the level of comprehension of lectures. However, the teachers agree on the contribution of DMs to future interactions as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%