Telecommunication exchange projects are currently marketed as curriculum supplements that conveniently satisfy three key K-12 educational reform objectives: better writing skills, enhanced multicultural awareness, and better job preparation for a rapidly expanding global economy. This paper analyzes the educational discourse surrounding telecommunication exchanges, and argues that much of the current research is contradictory, inconclusive, and possibly misleading. The paper also illustrates how the often overly optimistic claims about technology-based projects are problematic in light of the larger, exceedingly complex role of technology in society.As more and more schools achieve Internet capabilities and as educational technology discourse increasingly promotes the necessity of technological com petence and celebrates the promise of global connectivity, educators have been exploring ways to use-and rationalize the use of-the Internet in their class rooms. A growing trend during the past decade, beginning with the advent of email, has been the practice of global telecommunication exchange projects that encourage classroom connections between distant schools, oftentimes in differ ent countries. As Berenfeld (1996) writes, "the ability for one class to easily and cheaply communicate with either another or many throughout the world was so powerful that educators developed a number of successful learning projects around email" (p. 76). Telecommunication exchange projects are often coordi nated by individual teachers who locate distant partners on a number of educa tion-oriented Internet sites. The majority of these projects occur in the public domain, where teachers are the sole organizers, but telecommunication exchanges are also sold to schools as hassle-free educational services provided by wellknown corporations such as AT&T. Those who herald distant e-mail exchanges see them as an optimum way to satisfy three critical educational objectives inThe authors gratefully acknowledge the invaluable suggestions and com ments from Jim Marshall, Cynthia Lewis, and three anonymous reviewers.217 focus tends to be limited to the possible writing benefits of distant e-mail exchanges.Cohen and Riel (1989), Spaulding and Lake (1991), and Gallini and Helman (1995) all conducted audience-related experimental studies that looked at the impact of distant audiences in student writing and included treatment groups, 218 at TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY on December 1, 2014 http://rer.aera.net Downloaded from Telecommunication coding, and regression analysis in their methodologies. Cohen and Riel studied two groups of seventh graders, with group A writing an essay exam for their teacher and group B practicing their topic online with distant peers before writing the same exam. Students from group A then were asked to write to distant audiences about their exam topics. Spaulding and Lake analyzed high school remedial writing students' essay writing before a telecommunication exchange project and then again after the work from that project w...