1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05468.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of domestication on brain size and composition in the mink (Mustela vison)

Abstract: The sizes of total brain, the five fundamental brain parts, and certain telencephalic structures were measured in wild mink (Mustela vison energumenos) and ranch mink of a Dark Standard strain of the same species. By means of intraspecific allometric methods for analysing the relationship between brain weight and body weight (net carcass weight), the volumes of the brain parts were compared in both groups. In general, total brain, as well as all the parts measured, were smaller in size in ranch mink independen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
73
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mink (Mustela vison) has been undergoing domestication for about 120 yr. According to Kruska (1996), it can be calculated that only 80 further generations are needed to complete the domestication process of this species. Previously, genetic selection by farmers typically focused on fur properties, body size and reproductive success but, recently, temperament has also become a popular selection criterion (Hansen 1996;Malmkvist et al 1997).…”
Section: Mots Clésmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mink (Mustela vison) has been undergoing domestication for about 120 yr. According to Kruska (1996), it can be calculated that only 80 further generations are needed to complete the domestication process of this species. Previously, genetic selection by farmers typically focused on fur properties, body size and reproductive success but, recently, temperament has also become a popular selection criterion (Hansen 1996;Malmkvist et al 1997).…”
Section: Mots Clésmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on published information on the time of divergence of these populations, one would expect a closer genetic relationship between the black and colored mink than between black and wild mink. Keeping mink in captivity has also brought about some considerable morphological changes, even in the traits that have not been directly under selection, such as skull shape, sexual dimorphism and brain size (Lynch and Hayden 1995;Kruska 1996). Such differences could be examples of many other morphological and physiological changes that have taken place solely as a result of keeping mink in captivity.…”
Section: Interpopulation Genetic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intense selection, under more uniform environmental and nutritional conditions compared with the mink's natural habitat, has brought about enormous morphological changes, even in the traits that have not been directly under selection, due to correlated response to selection and adaptation to captivity. Captive mink have a different skull shape, smaller sexual dimorphism for size and skull-shape (Lynch and Hayden 1995), and smaller brains (Kruska 1996) compared with feral mink.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within any particular species, brain sizes will only range over a tiny fraction of this amount, but as phylogenetic variability must arise from the heri- [61]) and 12 adult wild mink brains with 12 adult ranch mink brains (brain sizes range from 7.2 to 10.4 g, ratio 1.44 [62]; the electronic supplementary material, table S1). He compared a number of other domestic and wild species with fewer individuals (reviewed and discussed in [63 -65]).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Variations In Brain Structurementioning
confidence: 99%