2019
DOI: 10.1113/ep088056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of dopamine on pulmonary diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume responses to exercise in young healthy humans

Abstract: New Findings What is the Central question?Does dopamine, a pulmonary vascular vasodilator, contribute to the regulation of pulmonary diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume responses to exercise and exercise tolerance? What are the main findings and their importance?Dopamine appears not to be important for regulating pulmonary diffusing capacity or pulmonary capillary blood volume during exercise in healthy participants. Dopamine blockade trials demonstrated that endogenous dopamine is important for mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study is the first to assess and compare the reliability of D LCO/NO metrics during exercise to the resting supine position. We Coffman et al, n.d.;Jorgenson et al, 2018) and the mF IO 2 technique (Michaelchuk et al, 2019;Tedjasaputra et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study is the first to assess and compare the reliability of D LCO/NO metrics during exercise to the resting supine position. We Coffman et al, n.d.;Jorgenson et al, 2018) and the mF IO 2 technique (Michaelchuk et al, 2019;Tedjasaputra et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These changes largely agree with findings from previous studies on healthy volunteers at various moderate to vigorous exercise intensities, based on both the D LCO/NO technique (Alves et al., 2022 ; Coffman et al., n.d . ; Jorgenson et al., 2018 ) and the technique (Michaelchuk et al., 2019 ; Tedjasaputra et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%