2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07515-0_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Driving Speed on Driver’s Visual Attention: Experimental Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EEG readings show two specific wave patterns specific to the human form: N170 at 170 milliseconds tied to facial recognition, and mu wave suppression tied to mirroring biological movement (Bentin, Allison, Puce, Perez, & McCarthy, 1996;Hobson & Bishop, 2017). The innate ability to recognize people in our visual field is limited by the perceptual narrowing that occurs due to the driving task, especially at higher speeds (Jo, Lee, & Lee, 2014;Rogers, Kadar, & Costall, 2005), the neurological priority for recognizing people remains and has a direct impact on driver behavior (Guéguen, Eyssartier, & Meineri, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG readings show two specific wave patterns specific to the human form: N170 at 170 milliseconds tied to facial recognition, and mu wave suppression tied to mirroring biological movement (Bentin, Allison, Puce, Perez, & McCarthy, 1996;Hobson & Bishop, 2017). The innate ability to recognize people in our visual field is limited by the perceptual narrowing that occurs due to the driving task, especially at higher speeds (Jo, Lee, & Lee, 2014;Rogers, Kadar, & Costall, 2005), the neurological priority for recognizing people remains and has a direct impact on driver behavior (Guéguen, Eyssartier, & Meineri, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the changes in Q0 and S1 are more substantial when α is ≤1 • and the maximum variations can attain 40% and 20%, respectively. For high-level highways (s ≈ 80 m~450 m [17]) with high vehicle speed v (v ≥ 80 km/h) and an extended driver-attention area, it is evident that the reflection conditions of the road surface within the driver's attention area vary considerably.…”
Section: Changes In Road Lighting Quality During the Full-service Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the CIE road surface reflection classification system utilizes 1 • as the observation angle α for collecting the reflectance data, which corresponds to a driver's point of view at a height of 1.5 m and a driver's attention area from 60 m to 160 m ahead. But, with the rapid development of urban road construction and vehicle manufacturing technology, the range of the driver's attention area has increased up to 20 m~450 m ahead [17], and the height of vehicles has expanded to 1.4 m~3 m [18]. Meanwhile, due to the need for the seat recline angle [19] and the distance between the driver's eyes and the interior rear-view mirror [20], the height of the driver's viewpoint can reach 1.2 m~2.5 m. As a result, the range of the actual observation angle α for contemporary drivers can be extended to 0.15 • ~7.12 • .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, drivers' dynamic visual features are most closely related to traffic accidents. 22,23 Some research findings demonstrated that vehicle speed significantly influences drivers' visual features [24][25][26] and high driving speed increases visual perception difficulty and directly influences driving safety when driving through a tunnel portal. Therefore, it is important to investigate drivers' eye movement features around the tunnel portal under different vehicle speeds as it could shed light on strategies to reduce traffic accidents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%