2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-019-08318-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of droplet morphology on the heat transfer performance of micro-/nanostructured surfaces in dropwise condensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that in the presence of non-condensable gases, the heat transfer performance of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces is not reduced by the wall thermal resistance caused by the condensate trapped between the microstructures. But due to the microstructures on the surface, the surface of the cylindrical microstructure is much larger than the surface of the frustum microstructure [11] , so the heat dissipation performance of the surface of the cylindrical microstructure is better than that of the surface of the frustum microstructure. When the cooling water flow rate G=500.7 g/min, the maximum heat flux on the cylindrical surface is 380.13 kW/m 2 , while the maximum heat flux on the truncated surface is only 173.29 kW/m 2 ; when the cooling water flow rate G=603.95 g/min, the maximum heat flux on the cylindrical surface is 458.44 kW/m 2 , while the maximum heat flux on the truncated surface is only 208.99 kW/m 2 .…”
Section: Stability Analysis Of Experimental Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that in the presence of non-condensable gases, the heat transfer performance of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces is not reduced by the wall thermal resistance caused by the condensate trapped between the microstructures. But due to the microstructures on the surface, the surface of the cylindrical microstructure is much larger than the surface of the frustum microstructure [11] , so the heat dissipation performance of the surface of the cylindrical microstructure is better than that of the surface of the frustum microstructure. When the cooling water flow rate G=500.7 g/min, the maximum heat flux on the cylindrical surface is 380.13 kW/m 2 , while the maximum heat flux on the truncated surface is only 173.29 kW/m 2 ; when the cooling water flow rate G=603.95 g/min, the maximum heat flux on the cylindrical surface is 458.44 kW/m 2 , while the maximum heat flux on the truncated surface is only 208.99 kW/m 2 .…”
Section: Stability Analysis Of Experimental Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, for Marangoni numbers higher than 2204, Marangoni convection can play a significant role in the droplet heat transfer characteristics. 19 The minimum droplet radius in which the Marangoni convection effect is significant can be computed using equation (11).…”
Section: Single Droplet Heat Transfer On a Microstructured Superhydro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TaleshBahrami et al 11 researched droplet morphology on microstructured surfaces. In their numerical model framework, The Cassie–Baxter and Wenzel models were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations