The effect of earnings management on external loan price: evidence from China

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore how external creditors assess firms’ financial aggressiveness in China. Design/methodology/approach Using bank loan-specific data, the authors investigate whether firms exhibit greater costs of bank loans when they engage in earnings manipulation and whether this association changes when restrictions on lenders’ compensation are promulgated. Findings The authors find compelling evidence that bank executives charge higher premiums on firms with accrual earnings management to compensate for additional financial risk but do not charge extra loan prices for firms conducting real earnings management (REM). The authors also find that the enactment of Robust Bank Executive Compensation (REBC) enhances the vigilance of bank executives on the overall client firms’ earnings manipulation, with the exception of REM conducted by state-owned firms. Originality/value The authors extend the current literature on the cost of external loans by focusing on bank loans and the influence of REBC. This study offers implications for policymakers in China and other emerging economics to control loan default and financial risk.

Industry specialization and tax avoidance in the Australian banking industry

“…However, these regulations do not completely eliminate manipulative practices in the banking industry. Previous studies have provided evidence for the existence of earnings management (Kanagaretnam et al, 2004(Kanagaretnam et al, , 2010Bratten et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2022) and tax avoidance practices in the banking industry. Similarly, Joshi et al (2020) indicate that banks can avoid taxes through various strategies.…”