1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00007946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi on Zn uptake and distribution in seedlings of Pinus sylvestris L

Abstract: Seedlings of pine, infected with two different ectomycorrhizal fungi, Suillus bovinus (Fr.) 0. Kuntze and an unidentified isolate (BP), were exposed to various external Zn concentrations. An additional strain of S. bovinus, cultured on a Zn-enriched medium, was also used. The effect of mycorrhizal associations on Zn uptake and distribution within the plant was determined by AAS.The results show that nonmycorrhizal seedlings have the capability to control the uptake and translocation of Zn to the shoot until th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The copper concentrations in Scots pine needles increased with increasing concentrations of Cu of Zn, Cd, Ni and Pb to shoots of ectomycorrhizal tree seedlings has been reported in many experiments (Jones and Hutchinson 1986, Denny and Wilkins 1987, Dixon 1988, Colpaert and Van Assche 1992, 1993, Bücking and Heyser 1994.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The copper concentrations in Scots pine needles increased with increasing concentrations of Cu of Zn, Cd, Ni and Pb to shoots of ectomycorrhizal tree seedlings has been reported in many experiments (Jones and Hutchinson 1986, Denny and Wilkins 1987, Dixon 1988, Colpaert and Van Assche 1992, 1993, Bücking and Heyser 1994.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Rühling et al (1984) observed a strong negative correlation between carpophore production of some ectomycorrhizal fungal genera and the Cu concentration in the soil organic layer around a zinc-copper smelter in south-eastern Sweden. Several laboratory studies have demonstrated that ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi can protect tree seedlings against heavy metal toxicity (Jones and Hutchinson 1986, 1988, Denny and Wilkins 1987, Colpaert and Van Assche 1992, Bücking and Heyser 1994, Marschner et al 1996. The ameliorating effect of ECM fungi has been attributed to reduced translocation of heavy metals to the host plant (Leyval et al 1997), although mycorrhizal-induced increases in nutrient uptake can also alleviate heavy metal stress in highly mycotrophic tree species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of metal sensitivity of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) seedlings have examined seedlings colonized before metal treatment (Brown & Wilkins, 1985 ;Chappelka et al, 1991 ;Colpaert & Van Assche, 1992, 1993Bu$ cking & Heyser, 1994). The authors of these studies reported a wide range of responses to potentially toxic metals and in most cases described some degree of amelioration of metal toxicity towards the hosts (Hartley et al, 1997a).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined in the Introduction, several authors have described host amelioration of metal toxicity by ECM fungi (Brown & Wilkins, 1985 ;Chappelka et al, 1991 ;Colpaert & Van Assche, 1992, 1993Bu$ cking & Heyser, 1994). However, most of those studies failed to consider the stimulation of plant biomass by ECM fungi in the absence of metal contamination.…”
Section: Cross-colonization By Paxillus Involutusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on degrees of ECM colonization is lacking in most literature on the topic (Bradley et al 1981(Bradley et al , 1982Brown and Wilkins 1985;Bucking and Heyser 1994;Hartley-Whitaker et al 2000b;Adriaensen et al 2004Adriaensen et al , 2006Kim et al 2004;Krupa and Kozdroj 2007;Krznaric et al 2009). Where data are supplied, reported levels of infection are relatively low probably due to the usage of artificial media: e.g., 9-27.8 % (Jourand et al 2010), 22-49 % (Clint andDighton 1992), or highly variable; e.g., 0-75 % , 0-67 % (Dixon 1988), 13-62 % (Hartley-Whitaker et al 2000a), 0-93 % (Dixon and Buschena 1988), but 80-100 % (Colpaert and Van Assche 1992), 50-100 % (Jones and Hutchinson 1988b;Van Tichelen et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%