2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of elevated progesterone levels before HCG triggering in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For natural endometrial preparations, some clinicians use serial LH tests. However, the role of serial LH monitoring with ultrasonogram has been a subject of much debate in natural endometrial preparations and there is no clear definition of or consensus regarding LH surge (42)(43)(44). Furthermore, serial LH tests are not covered by the national health insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For natural endometrial preparations, some clinicians use serial LH tests. However, the role of serial LH monitoring with ultrasonogram has been a subject of much debate in natural endometrial preparations and there is no clear definition of or consensus regarding LH surge (42)(43)(44). Furthermore, serial LH tests are not covered by the national health insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Premature progesterone elevations driven by the patient's own unsuppressed cycle has been reported, although, whether it does affect pregnancy outcomes is still debatable. 9,16 In the current study, all FET cycles were HRT cycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The premature proges- terone elevations have also been reported in frozen cycles, causing the implantation window to shift, although few studies regarding these effects have been published. 10,16 Early progesterone elevation has been reported in both natural cycles and HRT-induced protocols of frozen cycles. Premature progesterone elevations driven by the patient's own unsuppressed cycle has been reported, although, whether it does affect pregnancy outcomes is still debatable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, however, yields contradictory results ( Table 3). The optimal value, for instance, was 0.9 ng/ml for Urman et al [109] [126], and 1.2 for Bosch et al [59]. A recent retrospective study from the same author including more than 4000 cycles, selected 1.5 ng/ml as the critical cut-off after conducting a trend analysis, concluding that the AUC may be insufficient to predict success rates as there is a non-linear relationship between progesterone values and pregnancy outcome [76].…”
Section: Progesterone Cut-off Valuementioning
confidence: 99%