1976
DOI: 10.1016/0034-5687(76)90050-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of emboli upon intrapulmonary receptors in the cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that the decrease in lung compliance occurring during pulmonary venous congestion may be responsible for stimulation of the RARs (Sellick & Widdicombe, 1969;Armstrong, Luck & Martin, 1976;Yu, Coleridge & Coleridge, 1987). Support for this proposition is evident in the airway pressure measurements during pulmonary venous congestion particularly when the mean left atrial pressure was increased by 10 mmHg.…”
Section: Mechanisms For the Stimulation Of Rarsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been suggested that the decrease in lung compliance occurring during pulmonary venous congestion may be responsible for stimulation of the RARs (Sellick & Widdicombe, 1969;Armstrong, Luck & Martin, 1976;Yu, Coleridge & Coleridge, 1987). Support for this proposition is evident in the airway pressure measurements during pulmonary venous congestion particularly when the mean left atrial pressure was increased by 10 mmHg.…”
Section: Mechanisms For the Stimulation Of Rarsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the cat, it was found that injection of micro-emboli into the pulmonary arteries increased the peak intra-tracheal pressure and the activities of r.a.r., s.a.r. and pulmonary C-fibre receptors (Armstrong, Luck & Martin, 1976). Since the increase in peak intra-tracheal pressure persisted even after vagotomy, Armstrong et al (1976) attributed it to a decrease in dynamic compliance of the lung.…”
Section: Speculation On Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and pulmonary C-fibre receptors (Armstrong, Luck & Martin, 1976). Since the increase in peak intra-tracheal pressure persisted even after vagotomy, Armstrong et al (1976) attributed it to a decrease in dynamic compliance of the lung. In their study, it was found that the activity of these receptors was not elevated in a persistent manner, until the peak airway pressure increased by more than 1 cmH2O (074 mmHg).…”
Section: Speculation On Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are stimulated by a variety of pathophysiological changes in the airways e.g. pulmonary congestion (Mills, Sellick & Widdicombe, 1969;Kappagoda, Man & Teo, 1987;Hargreaves et al 1991), pulmonary oedema (Roberts, Bhattacharya, Schultz, Coleridge & Coleridge, 1986; and pulmonary embolism (Mills et al 1969;Armstrong, Luck & Martin, 1976). However, their role in increasing respiratory rate remains uncertain .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%