2024
DOI: 10.24084/repqj18.415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of energy storage on the Residual Load Duration Curve (rLDC) of a system with high Renewable Energy contribution

Abstract: This paper evaluates how energy storage acting in a system with a very high contribution from variable Renewable source can reduce peak loads. The methodology uses observed demand and renewable generation data to construct scenarios of increasing renewable contribution complemented by energy storage. The analysis is based on the concept of creating load duration curves for the period over which a set of storage technologies can act to reduce peak loads by storing energy during low loads. The models used here a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That initial rapid change gradually reduces suggesting that the marginal benefit of increasing the storage tails off rapidly at around the 10 to 20 MWh storage size. With the mean half-hourly consumption (Table I), this equates to a scale of 13 to 26 hours, confirming a common observation [2,14] that much of an ESS addresses the daily demand and generation cycle. Addressing imbalances across several days or weeks requires significantly larger capacities.…”
Section: B Effect Of Storage Sizesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…That initial rapid change gradually reduces suggesting that the marginal benefit of increasing the storage tails off rapidly at around the 10 to 20 MWh storage size. With the mean half-hourly consumption (Table I), this equates to a scale of 13 to 26 hours, confirming a common observation [2,14] that much of an ESS addresses the daily demand and generation cycle. Addressing imbalances across several days or weeks requires significantly larger capacities.…”
Section: B Effect Of Storage Sizesupporting
confidence: 66%