2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(00)00012-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of epidermal growth factor on the fetal rabbit mandibular condyle and isolated condylar fibroblasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both measures indicate an increase in cellular proliferation. 78 The authors also noted the role of EGF in matrix deposition, with tissue volume increasing toward the end of the culture period (21 days). 78 As research moves toward alternative cell sources, our understanding of bioactive signals must be translatable.…”
Section: Current Progress In Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Both measures indicate an increase in cellular proliferation. 78 The authors also noted the role of EGF in matrix deposition, with tissue volume increasing toward the end of the culture period (21 days). 78 As research moves toward alternative cell sources, our understanding of bioactive signals must be translatable.…”
Section: Current Progress In Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…78 The authors also noted the role of EGF in matrix deposition, with tissue volume increasing toward the end of the culture period (21 days). 78 As research moves toward alternative cell sources, our understanding of bioactive signals must be translatable. Notably, early work by Copray et al 87 demonstrated that most of the factors enhancing proliferation explored in their study, including EGF, similarly enhanced proliferation in secondary mandibular condylar cartilage as well as primary costal chondrocytes.…”
Section: Current Progress In Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…X-ray images were captured using the analysis system from Labtronics (Mississauga, ON, Canada). Quan-titation was done by viewing the X-ray image through a microscope and repetitively measuring the density within a standard area projected over the image of the section using the public domain NIH Image program (developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and available on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ nih-image/) (17). Binding was determined by measuring the to- tal counts of each section and dividing this by the area of that section to give mean counts per arbitrary unit area.…”
Section: Ligand-binding Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%