2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of epiphytic algae on the growth and production of Potamogeton perfoliatus L. in two light conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result indicates that epiphytic algae imposed a prominent adverse effect on the biomass accumulation of V. natans, especially when the nitrate-N concentration was 2.5-5 mg/L, at which point the epiphytic algal biomass attached on leaves of V. natans was particularly high. The adverse effect of epiphytic algae on the host plants was consistent with the result of some other previous studies [33,48]. As the nitrate-N concentration increased from 2.5 to 10 mg/L, the biomass of V. natans in the epiphytic algae group gradually increased, suggesting that increasing the nitrate-N concentration could neutralize the adverse effect of epiphytic algae on biomass accumulation of V. natans, probably because the growth of epiphytic algae was inhibited by a high nitrate-N concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result indicates that epiphytic algae imposed a prominent adverse effect on the biomass accumulation of V. natans, especially when the nitrate-N concentration was 2.5-5 mg/L, at which point the epiphytic algal biomass attached on leaves of V. natans was particularly high. The adverse effect of epiphytic algae on the host plants was consistent with the result of some other previous studies [33,48]. As the nitrate-N concentration increased from 2.5 to 10 mg/L, the biomass of V. natans in the epiphytic algae group gradually increased, suggesting that increasing the nitrate-N concentration could neutralize the adverse effect of epiphytic algae on biomass accumulation of V. natans, probably because the growth of epiphytic algae was inhibited by a high nitrate-N concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The chl-a/chl-b ratio reflecting the light utilization efficiency of photosynthesis in leaves of plants suggested that epiphytic algae aggravated the adverse influence on light utilization efficiency of V. natans at 2.5-5 mg/L nitrate-N in the water column, when epiphytic algal biomass was reaching a high level. This result was consistent with the demonstration that an epiphytic algal boom resulted in the decline of chl-a density in the leaves of plants [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epiphytes compete for light with macrophytes and, consequently, limiting production and growth of the plant substrate (Asaeda et al 2004;Jones and Sayer 2003).…”
Section: Potamogeton Perfoliatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, chlorophyll content and thickness of the epiphytic layer (Dodds et al 1999;Enríquez et al 1996) leads to a competitive interaction for light between periphyton and its macrophyte substrate (Bécares et al 2008;Jones and Sayer 2003). Thus, the specific depth distribution of epiphyte biomass directly influences light capture efficiency, morphology and physiology of macrophytes by additional attenuation of light at the adaxial side of leaves (Asaeda et al 2004;Sand-Jensen and Borum 1991;Sultana et al 2010). Macrophytes also affect periphyton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%