The effect of equity and bond issues on sustainability disclosure. Family vs non-family Italian firms

Abstract

Purpose\ud This article studies firms’ attitudes to using sustainability reporting in order to facilitate the raising of external capital and the effect of the ultimate controlling owner on disclosure. \ud Design/methodology/approach\ud A disclosure index is constructed on the basis of sustainability reports, for a sample of 230 Italian listed firms. Empirical analysis is based on panel data models. \ud Findings\ud Firms are more prone to disclose when they are planning to issue equity/bonds. Family control does not affect disclosure in the case of bond issues but it has a moderating effect in the case of equity issuance. A family CEO, increasing the family’s sense of identification with the business, improves disclosure.\ud Research limitations/implications\ud Family ownership is the most viable measure to assess its socioemotional-wealth. This catches only the dimension related to family control and influence but it doesn’t take into account other aspects of SEW. Our study focuses on the relation between disclosure and financing choices, it doesn't analyze the relationship between disclosure and the success of equity/bond issues.\ud Practical implications\ud Family firms should improve their sustainability reporting, especially for firms operating in environmentally-sensitive industries. Sustainability reports could play an effective role as a control mechanism in a firm’s behavior towards the environment, society, employees and consumers.\ud Originality/value\ud The paper contributes to the studies on sustainability, showing that the nature of ultimate controlling owners and firms’ financing decisions affect disclosure. Moreover, it contributes to family firms literature shedding light on the effect of the family control and sense of identification with the firm on disclosure

Earnings Management and CSR Disclosure. Family vs. Non-Family Firms

“…Previous studies have highlighted that inflating earnings practices in family firms is driven by the need to facilitate debt management [28]. The less significant relationship between upward earnings management and the extent of CSR suggests that family firms view this type of information as being of less interest for their lenders [112]: they may rely on other signals that are more focused on voluntary financial disclosure, such as earnings forecasts.…”

Board Governance and Sustainability Disclosure: A Cross-Sectional Study of Singapore-Listed Companies

“…Furthermore, since this study investigates six board-related factors from three different aspects of board governance, we avoid the problem of focusing narrowly on only one specific board characteristic, hence, minimizing the probability of omitting important variables in our regression analysis. Future research may actually explore even finer contextual delineations, such as family versus non-family firms [48] or other categories of stakeholders beyond shareholders as represented by the boards of directors [49].…”

The Romanian Family Businesses Philosophy for Performance and Sustainability

“…Berrone et al [43] continued the research and found that SEW is based on five different dimensions: "(1) Family control and influence; (2) identification of family members with the firm; (3) Binding social ties; (4) Emotional attachment; and (5) Renewal of family bonds to the firm through dynastic succession" (acronym FIBER). Recent studies draw on the socioemotional wealth framework, which effectively points out family firms' motivations and agency conflict peculiarities [44,45].…”