2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of error and regularization norms on strain and damage identification via electrical impedance tomography in piezoresistive nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Seppänen et al 2014a). While smoothness-promoting regularization methods can certainly be used in such cases (Tallman and Hernandez 2017), improved accuracy of damage location and distribution can be gained by using sharpness-promoting regularization. For this purpose, Total Variation regularization is most commonly used.…”
Section: Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Seppänen et al 2014a). While smoothness-promoting regularization methods can certainly be used in such cases (Tallman and Hernandez 2017), improved accuracy of damage location and distribution can be gained by using sharpness-promoting regularization. For this purpose, Total Variation regularization is most commonly used.…”
Section: Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some popular methods used for detecting local and/or distributed damage utilize optical [5], imagecorrelating [6], ultrasonic [7,8], capacitive [9,10], or direct-strain [11] modalities. Recently, the use of electrically-conductive sensing skins coupled with Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) for imaging spatially-distributed damage has been a source of much research interest [12,13,14,15,16,17]. In related works, the use of ERT to monitor moisture flow in cement-based materials, a significant contributer to environmental degradation, in two-and three-dimensions was shown in [18,19,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanocomposites have received tremendous attention from the structural health monitoring (SHM) research community because they are piezoresistive and therefore self-sensing. To date, much success has been had utilizing the piezoresistive effect to monitor damage initiation and accumulation via resistance change methods [1][2][3], strain identification [4][5][6], and in-plane damage localization via conductivity imaging techniques such as electrical impedance tomography (EIT) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Efforts are even being made to discern the precise strain state which gives rise to an observed conductivity change via the process of piezoresistive inversion [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%