1984
DOI: 10.3133/wsp2255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of eustatic sea-level changes on saltwater-freshwater relations in the northern Atlantic Coastal Plain

Abstract: Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 1 Previous investigations 2 Methods of study 3 Hydrogeology 5 Regional setting 5 Atlantic City section 5 Sea-level history 6 Computer simulation 7 Theoretical background 7 Conceptualization and simulation of the system 8 Discussion of model results 10 Comparison of model results with observed distribution of saltwater and freshwater 14 Development of the saltwater-freshwater transition zone 16 Geochemistry 16 Description of the transition zone 17 Interpretation of variation in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To mitigate the increasing demand on groundwater systems, offshore freshened groundwater (OFG) has been proposed as an alternative source of potable water (Bakken et al, 2012). The key emplacement mechanisms for OFG include present-day meteoric recharge from the onshore portion of the aquifer (Michael et al, 2016;Paldor et al, 2020) and/or meteoric recharge of shelf areas that were exposed during sea-level lowstands (Meisler et al, 1984). In the case of the latter, emplaced groundwater migrated landwards more slowly than the ensuing sea-level rise, and remnants of these groundwater bodies are still found offshore (Cronin, 2012;Harrar et al, 2001;Person et al, 2003;Post et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the increasing demand on groundwater systems, offshore freshened groundwater (OFG) has been proposed as an alternative source of potable water (Bakken et al, 2012). The key emplacement mechanisms for OFG include present-day meteoric recharge from the onshore portion of the aquifer (Michael et al, 2016;Paldor et al, 2020) and/or meteoric recharge of shelf areas that were exposed during sea-level lowstands (Meisler et al, 1984). In the case of the latter, emplaced groundwater migrated landwards more slowly than the ensuing sea-level rise, and remnants of these groundwater bodies are still found offshore (Cronin, 2012;Harrar et al, 2001;Person et al, 2003;Post et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rising demand for potable water in coastal regions has promoted growing research interest in detecting offshore freshened groundwater (OFG) worldwide (Post et al, 2013). OFG emplacement is commonly explained through either meteoric recharge during sea-level low-stands (e.g., Cohen et al, 2010;Meisler et al, 1984;Person et al, 2003) and/or through active meteoric recharge via permeable connections between onshore and offshore aquifers (e.g., Hong et al, 2019;Johnston, 1983;Weymer et al, 2022). Due to the ongoing pressure on terrestrial aquifers caused by environmental and anthropogenic stressors, offshore groundwater research has gained new urgency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%