1969
DOI: 10.1159/000385153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Experimental Malnutrition on the Development of Long Bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of malnutrition on the bones of experimental animals have been well documented [1,13,36,37]. In human malnutrition, marked deficiencies in compact and trabecular bone have been reported [2,19] as well as the cortical bone deficiency attributed to excessive endosteal resorption [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of malnutrition on the bones of experimental animals have been well documented [1,13,36,37]. In human malnutrition, marked deficiencies in compact and trabecular bone have been reported [2,19] as well as the cortical bone deficiency attributed to excessive endosteal resorption [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One brief mention should be made about malnutrition, as clinical and paleopathological studies have chronicled how a lack of proper nutrient during infancy can affect tooth and long bone development, as bones need certain levels of nutrients to grow effectively (Adams, ; Alvarez et al ., ; Martorell and Ho, 1984; Brown, ; Powell, ). As skeleton M53 lacks any prominent physiological stress markers, including porotic hyperostosis, cribra orbitalia and linear enamel hypoplasia, it suggests that this individual did not suffer from long‐term malnutrition or other generalised stress during infancy and/or early childhood.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosis Of M53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Denver Growth Study individuals attained a greater proportion of their total and cortical area during early skeletal ontogeny, whereas the two bioarchaeological samples initially grew more slowly and then accelerated as they neared adulthood. This pattern may be related to differences in nutrition prior to maturity, as it is well known that nutritional intake impacts the rate of longitudinal and cortical growth before skeletal growth is completed (Adams, 1969;Garn et al, 1969). In addition, juvenile skeletal development prior to the adolescent growth spurt may be less genetically canalised and more susceptible to environmental disruptions, which may explain the differences between these three samples before the age of 12 ( Johnston et al, 1976;Stinson, 2000).…”
Section: Nutritional Influences On Bone Growthmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Malnourished monkeys exhibit slower growth in midshaft femoral diameter than well-fed controls (Fleagle et al, 1975), and several studies have shown reduced long bone periosteal deposition in protein-deficient experimental animals (Jha & Ramalingaseami, 1968;Shrader & Zeman, 1973). Experimental studies inducing severe starvation in pigs have found that in addition to stunting long bone length, starvation results in a reduction of cortical bone and numerous Harris lines (Dickerson & McCance, 1961;Pratt & McCance, 1964;Adams, 1969).…”
Section: Nutritional Influences On Bone Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%