2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of fat content on visual attention and choice of red meat and differences across gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
2
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
27
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a well-founded consensus in the literature that the principal criterion used in meat choice is colour due to its relationship with freshness (Kubberød et al 2002;Bernu es et al 2012;Gracia and de Magistris 2013;Ripoll et al 2018b). However, visible fat content is also a main cue used to assess meat quality (Kubberød et al 2002;Banovi c et al 2016). Nevertheless, meat from light suckling kids has no apparent fat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a well-founded consensus in the literature that the principal criterion used in meat choice is colour due to its relationship with freshness (Kubberød et al 2002;Bernu es et al 2012;Gracia and de Magistris 2013;Ripoll et al 2018b). However, visible fat content is also a main cue used to assess meat quality (Kubberød et al 2002;Banovi c et al 2016). Nevertheless, meat from light suckling kids has no apparent fat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customer assessments on intrinsic quality attributes for beef products have a direct relationship with sensory attributes, visual characteristics and structural characteristics . Sensory profiling attributes are assessed by trained panellists using quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA).…”
Section: Literature On the Differences In Consumer Liking Of Beefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the older persons (50 years and older) had the highest proportion of persons ranking sample C (the visibly leanest sample, 11% fat) as the most preferred. Younger persons (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) had equal numbers ranking sample A (the visibly fattiest sample, 35% fat) as the most preferred compared to the leanest sample C (11%).…”
Section: Different Ethnicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%