2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Feedback on Attention Allocation in Category Learning: An Eye Tracking Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the task-comparison, the H0 hypothesis is rejected multiple times, roughly in half of all comparisons. These results are consistent with the research regarding the effect of feedback, being that feedback can be both influential (e.g., Arbel et al (2020); Hattie & Timperley (2007)) and noninfluential (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996). The simplest reason for this phenomenon is that the feedback of a chatbot does not have an equal influence on the attention of human, as humans do not react untimely to stimuli.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the task-comparison, the H0 hypothesis is rejected multiple times, roughly in half of all comparisons. These results are consistent with the research regarding the effect of feedback, being that feedback can be both influential (e.g., Arbel et al (2020); Hattie & Timperley (2007)) and noninfluential (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996). The simplest reason for this phenomenon is that the feedback of a chatbot does not have an equal influence on the attention of human, as humans do not react untimely to stimuli.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The H1 hypothesis is supported by the research of Arbel et al (2020) in psychology. To reject either the H0 or H1 hypotheses, it is mandatory to measure two variables: the feedback of the educational chatbot and the human attention of a person that is talking to the chatbot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%