2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of feeding barley on diet nutrient digestibility and growth performance of starter pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed by Nasir et al. (), where a lower quality barley had a higher ADG compared with a wheat‐based diet in young pigs. The quality of barley also affected the G:F ratio, with piglets offered the low quality barley having a higher G:F compared with the piglets offered the high quality barley.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar results were observed by Nasir et al. (), where a lower quality barley had a higher ADG compared with a wheat‐based diet in young pigs. The quality of barley also affected the G:F ratio, with piglets offered the low quality barley having a higher G:F compared with the piglets offered the high quality barley.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the utilization efficiency of some nutrients can be improved along with the appropriate supplementation of enzyme preparations. Nasir et al [ 8 ] found that barley partially replacing corn had no negative impact on the growth performance of piglets. Bruneau [ 9 ] and Mavromichalis et al [ 10 ] also found that wheat has high palatability to pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, Australia, and western Canada, barley and wheat are the main ingredients used in pig diets (Nasir et al, 2015). However, barley contains 22%, while wheat contains 13%, dietary fiber (DF) content in their whole grains, which cannot be degraded by monogastric animals due to lack of corresponding digestive enzymes (Bach Knudsen, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%