2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of filter size on VBM analyses of DT-MRI data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
375
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
10
375
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the size of the expected morphological differences is seldom known beforehand. Jones and colleagues reported different conclusions about the same patient-control comparison when different smoothing kernel sizes were applied in a VBM analysis of DTI data (Jones et al, 2005). The importance of matched filtering was clear in our VBM analysis of T1-weighted images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the size of the expected morphological differences is seldom known beforehand. Jones and colleagues reported different conclusions about the same patient-control comparison when different smoothing kernel sizes were applied in a VBM analysis of DTI data (Jones et al, 2005). The importance of matched filtering was clear in our VBM analysis of T1-weighted images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The third limitation is that none of our results survived correction for multiple comparisons, which is a common tendency in synesthesia studies (see Supplementary Material -Introduction: Table 1). In our case, both the use of an alternative statistical approach (nonparametric tests, given the size of our sample) and the finding of significant results even with a small spatial filter (4 mm), that is less likely to give significant results (Jones et al 2005), account for the reliability of the reported data. Despite these limitations and other possible artifacts arising from methodological constraints, the combination of VBM and DTI has provided accurate information about the nature of gray and white matter in the brain of synesthetes and has revealed structural data that are relevant to find a bridge between developmental and acquired synesthesia.…”
Section: The Canonical Regions Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Currently, despite many VBM studies, there is no clear consensus between an optimum smoothing kernel size. We chose the above smoothing kernel based on previous data published by Jones et al (2005a) and also that fit our empirical processing criteria.…”
Section: Analysis Of Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%