1996
DOI: 10.2307/2491424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Financial Statement Classification of Hybrid Financial Instruments on Financial Analysts' Stock Price Judgments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
117
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, analytical studies define disclosure quality in terms of the precision of a Bayesian investor's beliefs about security value after receiving the disclosure (e.g., Diamond and Verrecchia, 1991). Other studies define disclosure quality as the degree of self-interested bias in the disclosure (e.g., King, 1996), while yet others define quality as the ease with which investors can read and interpret the information (e.g., Hopkins, 1996).…”
Section: The Meaning Of Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, analytical studies define disclosure quality in terms of the precision of a Bayesian investor's beliefs about security value after receiving the disclosure (e.g., Diamond and Verrecchia, 1991). Other studies define disclosure quality as the degree of self-interested bias in the disclosure (e.g., King, 1996), while yet others define quality as the ease with which investors can read and interpret the information (e.g., Hopkins, 1996).…”
Section: The Meaning Of Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Hopkins (1996) is motivated by the behavioral idea that investors' assessment of financial statement items with hybrid natures may be affected by how these items are classified on financial statements. 5 To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first market-based study of the relation between market pricing and cash flow statement classification for hybrid items, and it is one of the few studies of the market pricing effects of any financial statement classification.…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Diamond and Verrecchia (1991) defines quality disclosure as the accuracy of investors" beliefs about stock prices following the disclosure. Moreover, quality disclosure is defined as current and potential investors can read and interpret the information easily (Hopkins, 1996). Further, Botosan (2004) stated that the definition of quality should be based on well-supported frameworks elaborated by professional accounting bodies and standard setters because they reflect a generally accepted notion of quality disclosure.…”
Section: Quality Of Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%