1984
DOI: 10.1079/bjn19840105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde application to lucerne before ensiling on silage fermentation and silage N digestion in sheep

Abstract: 1. The primary growth of lucerne (Medicago sativa) was ensiled after treatment with either formic acid alone (4.1 litres/t; silage F) or with formic acid and either formaldehyde (30.5 g/kg crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25; CP); silage FF), glutaraldehyde (44.2 g/kg CP; silage FG) or a mixture of the two aldehydes at approximately half their individual application rates (silage FFG).2. Compared with formic acid alone, both formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde reduced protein breakdown and carbohydrate fermentation dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in the present study was also within the ranges of values measured in vivo in which total VFA ranged from 6.5 to 8.8 mmol g -1 DM or OM digested in sheep (Leng and Brett 1966;Hogan 1968, 1971;Siddons et al 1984), and from 3.8 to 11 mmol g -1 DM or OM digested in cattle (Davis 1967;Esdale et al 1968;Rogers and Davis 1982a;SicilianoJones and Murphy 1989). Moreover, the molar ratios of acetate:propionate:butyrate on the grass hay diet (63:26:11) and the concentrate diet (47:28:25) were well within the ranges of values found in the rumen (Hungate 1988).…”
Section: Comparative Assessment Of Rusitec Systemsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…in the present study was also within the ranges of values measured in vivo in which total VFA ranged from 6.5 to 8.8 mmol g -1 DM or OM digested in sheep (Leng and Brett 1966;Hogan 1968, 1971;Siddons et al 1984), and from 3.8 to 11 mmol g -1 DM or OM digested in cattle (Davis 1967;Esdale et al 1968;Rogers and Davis 1982a;SicilianoJones and Murphy 1989). Moreover, the molar ratios of acetate:propionate:butyrate on the grass hay diet (63:26:11) and the concentrate diet (47:28:25) were well within the ranges of values found in the rumen (Hungate 1988).…”
Section: Comparative Assessment Of Rusitec Systemsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Nevertheless, the available data exhibit a wide diversity of experimental dietary treatments. While it is likely that total VFA-PR closely depends on the amount of RfOM, we know only two publications reporting simultaneous measurement of both in vivo total VFA-PR and actual RfOM (Mercer et al, 1980;Siddons et al, 1984). We assessed this relationship by fitting results of measured total VFA-PR (VFA-Prod database) to the amount of OM fermented in the rumen estimated by a homogeneous characterization of feed and diets according to INRA feed tables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher urinary N excretion for Hop‐diet in the present study compared to the previous findings (Al‐Mamun et al . 2008) might be partially due to the difference of diet as well as ensiling of hop residues, because ensiling without using any additives increases rumen ammonia production, much of which is excreted through the urine (Siddons et al . 1984).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower N digestibility of Hop‐diet compared to Hay‐diet also partially might be due to the ensiling of hop‐residues. In a previous study it has been stated that ensiling results in the herbage protein being degraded to non‐protein N (Siddons et al . 1984).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%