The effect of fraud triangle factors on students’ cheating behaviors

Choo, Freddie; Tan, Kim B.

doi:10.1016/s1085-4622(08)09009-3

Cited by 19 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Becker, Connoly, Lentz, and Morison (2006) found that all three factors predict dishonest behavior in business students (who rank the most likely to cheat). Their conclusion was largely confirmed by Choo and Tan (2008), who also identified that the three factors all held influence on a student's propensity to cheat (Figs. 5.6 and 5.7).…”

Section: Integrative Perspectivementioning

confidence: 75%

Fabrication and Cheating

Bos

2020

Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Integrative Perspectivementioning

confidence: 75%

Fabrication and Cheating

Bos

2020

Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a follow-up anonymous survey, students note a significantly higher understanding of plagiarism. Choo and Tan (2008) investigate the relation between the fraud triangle factors and students' propensity to cheating. The authors report the results of a full-factorial, within-subjects design, for 182 undergraduate students, with eight vignettes about student cheating using the three fraud triangle variables (i.e., 2 Â 2 Â 2 design, with each factor present or absent).…”

Section: Academic Dishonestymentioning

confidence: 99%

Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)

Apostolou

Hassell

Rebele

et al. 2010

Journal of Accounting Education

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Vol.10, No.2, December 2021 Cheating behavior is cannot be justified, it is a problem that can leads to confusion in measuring students' abilities, among other adverse effects. Cheating behavior blurs the students' ability and mastery as the score can no longer represent one's true ability (Choo & Tan, 2015;Ding, et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effectiveness of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Group Counseling in Reducing Cheating Behaviors

Nugraha

Hartini

2022

PSIKOPEDAGOGIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to reduce cheating behavior in students by using Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy group counseling. This research is a pre-experimental design research, namely One Group Pretest and Posttest Design. The subjects of this study were ten third semester students of the Guidance and Counseling study program at Ahmad Dahlan University, ten students were taken using purpsoive sampling technique. The instrument used in this research is the cheating behavior scale. Analysis of the data used in this study by using the effectiveness test with the t-test formula. The results of the study showed that group counseling with the Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy approach was proven effective in reducing cheating behavior in Guidance and Counseling students at Ahmad Dahlan University. Most of the cheating behavior carried out by students in the category of social passive and cheating behavior in students is mostly based on a lack of confidence in their abilities. The results of this study can be used as an alternative counseling strategy for counselors in universities to reduce cheating behavior in students. Kata kunci : group counseling, cheating, rational emotive behavior terapy.

show abstract

The effect of fraud triangle factors on students’ cheating behaviors

Cited by 19 publications

References 20 publications

Fabrication and Cheating

Fabrication and Cheating

Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)

The Effectiveness of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Group Counseling in Reducing Cheating Behaviors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About