2001
DOI: 10.1002/wcm.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Gaussian error in selection diversity combiners

Abstract: Selection diversity combining (SDC) is one of the simplest and most commonly implemented diversity mechanism for mitigating the detrimental effects of deep fades experienced on wireless channels. While SDC improves the mean combined signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) over that of a single branch with increasing diversity order, its main advantage is the reduction of the probability of deep fades. The effect of Gaussian errors in the branch gain estimates on the SDC receiver performance is investigated by deriving new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(20)] shows that with a completely decorrelated fade estimate the error probability approaches that of a system with no diversity, whereas we show that BDPSK is insensitive to channel estimation errors (see (119) in this paper). References [12], and [13] extend the results of [11] for selection combining (SC, i.e., GDC ) and GDC schemes, respectively, and for various modulation/demodulation formats. We address the following main limitations of [12] and [13].…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Linear Modulation Schemes With Genermentioning
confidence: 53%
“…(20)] shows that with a completely decorrelated fade estimate the error probability approaches that of a system with no diversity, whereas we show that BDPSK is insensitive to channel estimation errors (see (119) in this paper). References [12], and [13] extend the results of [11] for selection combining (SC, i.e., GDC ) and GDC schemes, respectively, and for various modulation/demodulation formats. We address the following main limitations of [12] and [13].…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Linear Modulation Schemes With Genermentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Again, we also observe that as ρ → 0, the average probability of error P SC → 0.5, independent of the amount of diversity present in the channel. However, the optimistic lower-bound analysis of [11] and [12] shows that the average probability of error P SC → P 1 (γ), as ρ → 0, resulting in orders of magnitude difference in the true performance prediction.…”
Section: Selection Combiningmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tomiuk et al,in [10], used the SNR statistics derived by Gans in [9], to average the conditional probability of error, and thus, to obtain the average probability of error for the MRC diversity scheme. In [11] and [12], this idea was extended to SC and GSC diversity schemes, respectively, to derive the average error rates for various combinations of modulation and demodulation schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakagami fading channels versus the normalized average SNR per branch. These curves have been generated by substituting (13) in [5, eqn. (9B.9)], with A set to equal 10 ln 10 23.026 to guarantee a discretization error of less than 10 −10 and with K = 15 and N = 30 to guarantee that the truncation error is negligible compared to the computed outage probability.…”
Section: Average Bit Error Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%