2014
DOI: 10.15414/afz.2014.17.02.52-54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of genotype and sex on performance and meat composition of geese

Abstract: IntroductionGeese rearing in the Czech Republic has a long tradition. For intensive meat production hybrid geese are used in particular, Czech Goose has an importance especially in small farming.Geese have a rapid growth rate during the first weeks of life, they reach 70-80 % of adult weight at 9 weeks of age. Males exceed females in growth rate by more than 10 % up to age of 8 weeks (Tilki et al., 2005). Saatci et al. (2009) observed that sex influences also weight of carcass and its single parts are signific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dressing percentage with and without giblets for the ZG ranged from 66.1 to 73.3% respectively, and was about 3 percentage points lower ( P < 0.05) than that for the WKG. In contrast, in studies with the Czech goose and commercial hybrids ( Tůmová and Uhliřová, 2013 , Uhliřová and Tůmová, 2014 , Uhliřová et al., 2018 , Uhliřová et al., 2019 ), the dressing percentage was not dependent on goose genotype and was similar to the results for the ZG obtained in our study. In studies on Turkish native geese, the dressing percentage ranged from 69% to 71% ( Isguzar and Pingel, 2003 ) and from 66% to 67% ( Tilki et al., 2005 , Saatci et al., 2009 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The dressing percentage with and without giblets for the ZG ranged from 66.1 to 73.3% respectively, and was about 3 percentage points lower ( P < 0.05) than that for the WKG. In contrast, in studies with the Czech goose and commercial hybrids ( Tůmová and Uhliřová, 2013 , Uhliřová and Tůmová, 2014 , Uhliřová et al., 2018 , Uhliřová et al., 2019 ), the dressing percentage was not dependent on goose genotype and was similar to the results for the ZG obtained in our study. In studies on Turkish native geese, the dressing percentage ranged from 69% to 71% ( Isguzar and Pingel, 2003 ) and from 66% to 67% ( Tilki et al., 2005 , Saatci et al., 2009 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Both the body weight and weight of the eviscerated carcass of the ZG were about 565 g (12%) and 545 g (17.5%) lower ( P < 0.05), respectively, than those of the WKG. Similarly, lower body and carcass weights of the traditional Czech Goose compared with those of Eskildsen Schwer and Novohradská goose hybrids were noted by Uhliřová and Tůmová, 2014 , Tůmová and Uhliřová, 2013 , and Uhliřová et al., 2018 , Uhliřová et al., 2019 . The dressing percentage with and without giblets for the ZG ranged from 66.1 to 73.3% respectively, and was about 3 percentage points lower ( P < 0.05) than that for the WKG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations