2008
DOI: 10.1177/8755123308317612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Grade, Experience, and Listening Condition on the Melodic Error Detection of Fifth- and Sixth-Grade Woodwind Students

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of grade level and playing experience as well as listening condition on melodic error detection by young instrumental students. Participants (N = 31) were fifth-and sixth-grade students with either 1 or 2 years of experience playing their instrument. The participants were tested in two listening conditions, listening to recordings and listening to themselves while playing. Analysis of the data revealed no differences attributable to listening condition, g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to speculate on why participants initially had higher self-assessment ratings before listening to the recording. These results are congruous with Waggoner's (2011) exploration of conductor self-assessment; however, they are inconsistent with Thornton's (2004Thornton's ( , 2008) studies aimed at fifth-and sixth-grade instrumentalists. It could be that listeners were unable to accurately assess themselves while performing the etude.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting to speculate on why participants initially had higher self-assessment ratings before listening to the recording. These results are congruous with Waggoner's (2011) exploration of conductor self-assessment; however, they are inconsistent with Thornton's (2004Thornton's ( , 2008) studies aimed at fifth-and sixth-grade instrumentalists. It could be that listeners were unable to accurately assess themselves while performing the etude.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The use of recordings is by no means a novel concept. Recordings have been used for a variety of purposes ranging from teacher training (Doerksen, 1999;Furman, 1987;Stuart, 1977Stuart, , 1979, to conducting (Johnston, 1993), to self-evaluation (Carroll, 1987;Daniel, 2001;Hewitt, 2001Hewitt, , 2002Robinson, 1993;Thornton, 2004Thornton, , 2008. The use of recordings as models to aid in error detection has also shown to be beneficial (Crowe, 1996;Montemayor & Ross, 2009;Tryon, 2006), and research has suggested that listeners are better able to identify errors when listening to a recording of the music as opposed to identifying errors while performing or conducting the music (Delzell, 1989;Ellis, 1989;Waggoner, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous research (e.g., Byo, 1993; Thornton, 2008), synthesized sounds in prerecorded files were used to ensure identical presentations of the stimuli. The test items were created in Finale using the Grand Piano timbre and the Vocal Oohs timbre, which allowed us to control all parameters of the sound test files.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formative assessment-related studies in K–12 music education have mainly targeted error detection ability (identifying errors in one’s own performance and in other’s performances) and self-evaluation of instrumental skill (Hewitt, 2001, 2005, 2011; Thornton, 2008). Error detection ability has not been linked to improving students’ instrumental skill (Thornton, 2008) and studies of self-evaluation’s impact on various facets such as performance and self-evaluation accuracy have yielded inconsistent results (Hewitt, 2001, 2002, 2005, 2011). For example, Hewitt (2001) documented significant increases in middle school instrumentalists’ tone production, melodic accuracy, rhythmic accuracy, interpretation, and overall performance for those students who listened to a recorded model while engaging in self-evaluation, in comparison to students who only listened to the recorded model.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a subsequent study (Hewitt, 2011), self-evaluation instruction did not have a significant effect on middle school instrumentalists’ self-evaluation accuracy or instrumental performance. While error detection ability or self-evaluation may not be related to improving instrumental students’ performance skills, both Thornton (2008) and Hewitt (2011) asserted that these strategies may promote self-regulated learning and more musical independence. Many facets of formative assessment remain unexplored, in particular studies that investigate elementary-level students in general music classes.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%