2010
DOI: 10.1175/2010mwr3191.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Grid Spacing and Domain Size on the Quality of Ensemble Regional Climate Downscaling over South Asia during the Northeasterly Monsoon

Abstract: The performance of an ensemble-based dynamical regional climate downscaling system is evaluated over southern Asia in a northeasterly monsoon season for different choices in grid spacing and domain size. A seven-member ensemble of the ECHAM4.5 global climate model at a resolution of about 300-km grid size was used to drive the RegCM3 regional climate model with grid sizes of 100, 50, 25, and 20 km, respectively. The performance is reported in detail over Sri Lanka. Two sets of regional model runs were undertak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RCM simulation with 50-km grid size also significantly underestimates the height of the topography in South Korea; the resolution is too coarse to capture orographic influences on the rainfall. The impacts of grid and domain sizes on the RCM's rainfall simulation have been well documented in many works (e.g., Leduc and Laprise 2009;Qian and Zubair 2010). Figure 3 shows the 20-yr biases of monthly-mean temperature and daily precipitation simulated by the eight ensemble members for four selected months over South Korea.…”
Section: ) Multivariate Linear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The RCM simulation with 50-km grid size also significantly underestimates the height of the topography in South Korea; the resolution is too coarse to capture orographic influences on the rainfall. The impacts of grid and domain sizes on the RCM's rainfall simulation have been well documented in many works (e.g., Leduc and Laprise 2009;Qian and Zubair 2010). Figure 3 shows the 20-yr biases of monthly-mean temperature and daily precipitation simulated by the eight ensemble members for four selected months over South Korea.…”
Section: ) Multivariate Linear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In general, the high resolution RCM produces better results than the GCM-produced LBCs (e.g., Qian and Zubair, 2010;De Sales and Xue, 2011;Caron et al, 2011). However, such comparison may be misleading because the improvement could be due to the better dynamic or physical treatments in the RCMs.…”
Section: Domain Size Domain Position and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characteristic has been very difficult to correctly simulate; thus, many models underestimate factors such as the interannual variability in monsoon precipitation (Kim et al 2008). There is evidence that some of this deficiency may originate from the relatively low resolution and therefore deficient topography of the CMIP3 models (Qian & Zubair 2010).…”
Section: West Pacific Monsoonmentioning
confidence: 99%